Create Multiple Websites (Batch)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are present (non-readonly, not destructive, open world). Description adds that it returns workflow_ids and suggests polling, but doesn't detail failure handling or concurrency limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff, front-loaded with limit and purpose. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers limit, workflow_id return, and polling guidance. Lacks error handling details for individual items, but adequate for a batch tool with output schema absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds limited parameter insight beyond 'one workflow_id per item' (output-focused). Baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it starts up to 25 website-creation workflows, returns workflow_ids, and distinguishes from singular tools like create_website by emphasizing batch capability.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States when to use (batch creation) and provides polling alternatives (batch_check_website_status vs check_website_status). Lacks explicit exclusions but implies for single creation use create_website.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.