Get Workspace Analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds no behavioral insight. Without any output schema or further details, the agent cannot infer what data is returned or if there are any side effects beyond being read-only. The description fails to disclose the scope or granularity of analytics (e.g., workspace-level vs per-site).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, incomplete sentence. While concise, it provides no substantive information, making it under-specified rather than efficient. Every word should add value, but 'Get workspace analytics' adds none beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and the presence of sibling tools like get_website_analytics, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what analytics are included, whether there are authentication requirements, or how it differs from similar tools. The tool is simple but the description still fails to provide a complete picture.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the input schema is trivially covered at 100%. According to guidelines, baseline is 4 for 0 parameters. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, but no additional semantic clarification is needed since there are no parameters to describe.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is 'Get workspace analytics,' which is a tautology that merely restates the tool name and title. It does not specify what 'workspace analytics' entails, such as the type of metrics or data returned, nor does it distinguish this tool from other analytics tools like get_website_analytics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are sibling tools like get_website_analytics and get_workspace that could overlap, but no contextual hints or exclusions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.