setbio
Update your Telegram account bio directly from the terminal without leaving your CLI workflow.
Instructions
Set your account bio
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Update your Telegram account bio directly from the terminal without leaving your CLI workflow.
Set your account bio
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It says 'set' but does not disclose whether this overwrites an existing bio, requires authentication, has length limits, or what the result looks like.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately concise for a simple tool name and purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a mutation tool with no annotations, no output schema, and an empty input schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain how a bio value is supplied or what happens when the tool is invoked, despite the tool requiring some way to set the bio.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter meaning because there are no parameters to document.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource: 'Set' plus 'account bio'. The resource differentiates it from siblings like setname and setphoto, but the description does not explicitly call out those alternatives.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides no when-to-use context, prerequisites, or comparison to alternatives such as profile, setname, or setphoto. Usage is only implied by the tool name and purpose.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.