Skip to main content
Glama
operational-data-mcp

operational-data-mcp

by leemarcum

operational-data-mcp

A Model Context Protocol server that exposes operational and industrial telemetry to Claude and other MCP clients.

It ships with a sample ice cream packaging plant dataset (three machines, three days of hourly production, scheduled downtime events, and a couple of injected anomalies) so it works out of the box. Point it at your own JSON data via an environment variable to use it on real workloads.

npx operational-data-mcp

That's a working MCP server on stdio, no install step. Run on its own it sits silent waiting for a client, which is correct behavior for stdio transport.

To see what it actually does without wiring up a client first:

git clone https://github.com/leemarcum/operational-data-mcp
cd operational-data-mcp && npm install && npm run demo

npm run demo starts the server, calls every tool over stdio, and prints exactly what an MCP client receives — throughput attainment per machine, statistical outliers in the hourly counts, and the downtime events behind them.

The rest of this README explains why it exists, how to wire it into Claude Desktop, what each tool does, and how to extend it for your own plant or operational system.


Why this exists

Most "AI agent for operations" demos either skip the data-integration problem entirely or hand-wave it with a generic SQL connector. The hard part of doing this work for real is somewhere else: operational systems were built before MCP existed, the data is fragmented across vendors and protocols, and the security boundaries are there for good reasons.

I built this because I wanted a clean reference implementation of the pattern I keep using on real plants — a single MCP server that normalizes operational data into a few well-shaped tools an LLM can reason about. List your assets. Query production. Roll up throughput against target. Find the hours that look wrong. Same five questions on every plant floor, regardless of vendor.

The dataset is small on purpose. Replace it with yours and the same questions still apply.


Related MCP server: TrakSYS MCP Server

What you get

Five tools, three resources, one bundled dataset:

Tool

What it does

list_assets

Returns every machine in the dataset with metadata (line, vendor, controller, target throughput).

query_production

Filters hourly production counts by asset id and time window.

query_downtime

Filters downtime events by asset, cause code, or time window.

summarize_throughput

Rolls up attainment percentage and downtime minutes per asset over a window.

find_anomalies

Runs a simple z-score anomaly detector over hourly production counts.

Three resources (raw JSON, addressable by URI):

  • opdata://datasets/assets

  • opdata://datasets/production

  • opdata://datasets/downtime


Install and wire into Claude Desktop

Add this block to your claude_desktop_config.json (Settings → Developer → Edit Config):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "operational-data": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "operational-data-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Restart Claude Desktop. The five tools above will appear in the tool drawer. Ask Claude things like:

Roll up Line A's attainment for June 2 and tell me what drove the gap from target.

Are there any hours on the Line B cartoner that look like anomalies? What was happening around them?

What's the most common downtime cause across all three assets?


Use your own data

The server reads three JSON files from a directory. Set OPDATA_DATA_DIR to point at yours:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "operational-data": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "operational-data-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "OPDATA_DATA_DIR": "/absolute/path/to/your/data"
      }
    }
  }
}

The directory must contain assets.json, production.json, and downtime.json. Schemas (intentionally minimal):

assets.json — array of:

{
  "id": "LINE-A-FILLER",
  "name": "Line A Pint Filler",
  "line": "A",
  "type": "filler",
  "target_per_hour": 4800,
  "vendor": "Tetra Pak",
  "controller": "Allen-Bradley CompactLogix"
}

production.json — array of:

{ "timestamp": "2026-06-01T06:00:00Z", "asset_id": "LINE-A-FILLER", "count": 4720 }

downtime.json — array of:

{
  "asset_id": "LINE-A-FILLER",
  "start": "2026-06-02T02:00:00Z",
  "minutes": 90,
  "cause_code": "CIP_WASHDOWN",
  "note": "Scheduled clean-in-place"
}

Anything extra in those objects is preserved and returned to the client. That's intentional — keeps the schema honest while letting you carry your own metadata through.


Run from source

git clone https://github.com/leemarcum/operational-data-mcp
cd operational-data-mcp
npm install
npm start

Inspect interactively with the official MCP Inspector:

npm run inspect

To regenerate the bundled sample data:

node scripts/generate-fixtures.js

Where this goes next

Honest list of what I'd add when a real use case shows up:

  • Streaming sources — swap the file-backed store for a Kafka/MQTT subscriber so production data flows in live. The tool surface stays the same; only the store layer changes.

  • More analyzers — OEE rollups, shift comparisons, changeover-time tracking. All composable on top of the same primitives.

  • Auth and RBAC — once an MCP server starts touching real operational data, you need ABAC at the tool level. The MCP protocol supports this; this reference doesn't implement it yet.

  • Bridging legacy controllers — most plants I've worked in have at least one machine speaking Modbus or OPC UA. A thin adapter that polls those and writes into this server's format gets you most of the way.

If you're using this for something real and want one of those, open an issue.


Why I built it

I spent fifteen years working in industrial automation — robotics, controls, plant networking — while writing production software in parallel. The pattern this server demonstrates is the one I keep using on real plants: take fragmented operational data that nobody can easily query, put it behind a small set of well-shaped tools, and let an LLM (or anyone else) answer the same five questions about it that an experienced operator would ask.

The cleanest production version of that pattern was at an ice cream plant where I networked previously-isolated lines together for real-time downtime and throughput visibility. The bundled dataset is a sanitized echo of what that data looked like.

— Lee Hunter Marcum github.com/leemarcum


License

MIT. See LICENSE.

Available Tools

5 tools
find_anomaliesFind AnomaliesA

Run simple z-score anomaly detection on production counts. Returns timestamps where an asset's hourly count is more than threshold standard deviations away from its mean.

Inputs: asset_id, threshold.

list_assetsList AssetsB

List all machines / production lines in the operational dataset, with their metadata (type, line, target throughput).

Inputs: no named parameters.

query_downtimeQuery Downtime EventsC

Return downtime events, optionally filtered by asset id, time range, or cause code.

Inputs: end, limit, start, asset_id, +1 more.

query_productionQuery Production CountsB

Return hourly production counts, optionally filtered by asset id and/or time range. Time range is ISO 8601 timestamps.

Inputs: end, limit, start, asset_id.

summarize_throughputSummarize ThroughputA

Roll up production counts vs. target throughput per asset. Returns total produced, target, attainment ratio, and downtime minutes per asset over the (optionally bounded) time window.

Inputs: end, start.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct purpose: listing assets, querying production, querying downtime, summarizing throughput, and detecting anomalies. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool for a given task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_assets, query_production). The only minor deviation is 'find_anomalies' instead of 'list_anomalies' or 'query_anomalies', but it still maintains the verb_noun structure and is consistent with the overall style.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for an operational data analysis domain. Each tool provides essential functionality without being excessive, covering asset listing, data querying, summarization, and anomaly detection appropriately.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers core querying and analysis needs (production, downtime, throughput, anomalies) but lacks write operations (e.g., adding or updating assets/events) and more advanced analysis (e.g., trend forecasting). This is acceptable for a read-only data exploration server, but leaves gaps for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides secure, read-only access to the TrakSYS manufacturing analytics platform through entity-based tools and guided investigation prompts. It enables users to interact with manufacturing databases and perform data analysis via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Universal MCP server for industrial PLC communication, enabling AI agents to read sensors, alarms, status, setpoints, and write setpoints via adapters for Modbus, S7, or custom PLCs.
      6
      MIT