Dutch-law-mcp
Enables querying Dutch law from GitHub Copilot via the MCP gateway for legal research and compliance checks.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Dutch-law-mcp What does Dutch law say about wrongful termination?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Dutch Law MCP Server
The Dutch law corpus is now served through the Ansvar Gateway. Connect your AI assistant (Claude, Copilot, Cursor, custom MCP client) to
https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp— one OAuth connection, free tier available, covering this corpus plus EU regulations, national law across 28 audited jurisdictions, and CVE/security intelligence, every result with a verbatim source citation. Start at https://ansvar.eu/docs/quickstart
Connect
Claude Code (one line):
claude mcp add ansvar --transport http https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcpClaude Desktop / Cursor — add to claude_desktop_config.json (or mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"ansvar": {
"type": "url",
"url": "https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp"
}
}
}Claude.ai — Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → paste https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp
First request opens an OAuth signup flow (setup details: ansvar.eu/docs/quickstart). After signup, your client is bound to your account; tier (free / premium / team / company) determines fan-out, quota, and which downstream MCPs are reachable.
Self-host this MCP
You can also clone this repo and build the corpus yourself. The schema, fetcher, and tool implementations all live here. What is not in the repo is the pre-built database — TDM and standards-licensing constraints on the upstream sources mean we host the corpus on Ansvar infrastructure rather than redistribute it as a public artifact.
Build your own: run this repo's ingestion script (entry-point varies per
repo — typically scripts/ingest.sh, npm run ingest, or make ingest;
check the repo root).
The Wetten.overheid.nl alternative for the AI age.
Query 3,251 Dutch statutes -- from the AVG and Wetboek van Strafrecht to the Burgerlijk Wetboek, Mededingingswet, and the full BWB corpus -- directly from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.
If you're building legal tech, compliance tools, or doing Dutch legal research, this is your verified reference database.
Built by Ansvar Systems -- Stockholm, Sweden
Related MCP server: ris-mcp
Why This Exists
Dutch legal research is scattered across Wetten.overheid.nl, Rechtspraak.nl, Kamerstukken, and EUR-Lex. Whether you're:
A lawyer validating citations in a brief or contract
A compliance officer checking AVG obligations or Mededingingswet requirements
A legal tech developer building tools on Dutch law
A researcher tracing legislative history from Kamerstukken to wet
...you shouldn't need dozens of browser tabs and manual PDF cross-referencing. Ask Claude. Get the exact provision. With context.
This MCP server makes Dutch law searchable, cross-referenceable, and AI-readable.
Quick Start
Dutch Law is reachable through the Ansvar MCP Gateway at https://gateway.ansvar.eu. The gateway terminates OAuth, fans queries out across the Dutch corpus, and returns citation-grounded answers. There is no public unauthenticated endpoint.
Connect via Ansvar Gateway
Sign up at gateway.ansvar.eu for a Premium / Team / Company tier account, then point your client at the gateway:
Claude Desktop -- add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"ansvar-gateway": {
"type": "url",
"url": "https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp"
}
}
}Claude Code:
claude mcp add ansvar-gateway --transport http https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcpGitHub Copilot -- add to VS Code settings.json:
{
"github.copilot.chat.mcp.servers": {
"ansvar-gateway": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp"
}
}
}The gateway authenticates via Keycloak OAuth 2.1 with Dynamic Client Registration. On first connect your client will open a browser tab for sign-in and consent.
Run Locally (Docker)
For development or air-gapped deployments, the GHCR image ships with the prebuilt SQLite database baked in:
docker run --rm -p 3009:3009 ghcr.io/ansvar-systems/dutch-law-mcp:latestThe image self-tests via the bundled HEALTHCHECK and exits non-zero if the database is missing. Watchtower-driven fleets get automatic rolling updates on every push to main.
Example Queries
Once connected, just ask naturally in Dutch or English:
"Wat zegt de AVG artikel 5 over de beginselen voor de verwerking van persoonsgegevens?"
"Is de Mededingingswet artikel 24 over misbruik van machtspositie nog van kracht?"
"Zoek bepalingen over gegevensbescherming in de Nederlandse wet"
"Welke EU-richtlijnen implementeert de AVG?"
"Valideer de citatie 'Wetboek van Strafrecht artikel 138b'"
"Bouw een juridisch standpunt op over privacyrecht in Nederland"
"What does Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 6 say about contractual liability?"
"Find provisions about trade secrets in Dutch law"
What's Included
Category | Count | Details |
Statutes | 3,251 laws | Full BWB corpus from Wetten.overheid.nl (100% coverage) |
Provisions | 77,531 sections | Full-text searchable with FTS5 |
Premium: Case Law | 59,261 rulings | Hoge Raad, Gerechtshoven, Rechtbanken decisions |
Premium: Preparatory Works | 2,994 documents | Kamerstukken, memorie van toelichting |
Database Size | 126 MB | Optimized SQLite, portable |
Daily Updates | Automated | Freshness checks against Wetten.overheid.nl |
Key Statutes Covered
Statute | Subject |
Burgerlijk Wetboek (Boek 1–10) | Civil Code -- persons, property, contracts, tort |
Wetboek van Strafrecht | Criminal Code |
Algemene wet bestuursrecht | General Administrative Law Act |
Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (AVG) | GDPR implementation |
Mededingingswet | Competition Act |
Auteurswet | Copyright Act |
Arbeidsomstandighedenwet | Working Conditions Act |
Wet bescherming bedrijfsgeheimen | Trade Secrets Act |
Telecommunicatiewet | Telecommunications Act (ePrivacy) |
Wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft) | Financial Supervision Act |
Verified data only -- every citation is validated against official sources (Wetten.overheid.nl, Overheid.nl). Zero LLM-generated content.
See It In Action
Why This Works
Verbatim Source Text (No LLM Processing):
All statute text is ingested from Wetten.overheid.nl official sources via the BWB API
Provisions are returned unchanged from SQLite FTS5 database rows
Zero LLM summarization or paraphrasing -- the database contains regulation text, not AI interpretations
Smart Context Management:
Search returns ranked provisions with BM25 scoring (safe for context)
Provision retrieval gives exact text by BWB identifier + chapter/article
Cross-references help navigate without loading everything at once
Technical Architecture:
Wetten.overheid.nl BWB API → Parse → SQLite → FTS5 snippet() → MCP response
↑ ↑
Provision parser Verbatim database queryTraditional Research vs. This MCP
Traditional Approach | This MCP Server |
Search Wetten.overheid.nl by wet name | Search by plain Dutch: "persoonsgegevens verwerking" |
Navigate multi-boek statutes manually | Get the exact provision with context |
Manual cross-referencing between wetten |
|
"Is this statute still in force?" → check manually |
|
Find EU basis → dig through EUR-Lex |
|
Check Kamerstukken.nl separately | Premium |
No API, no integration | MCP protocol → AI-native |
Traditional: Search Wetten.overheid.nl → Open BWB page → Navigate articles → Check Kamerstukken → EUR-Lex for EU basis → Repeat
This MCP: "What EU law is the basis for AVG artikel 5 about data processing principles?" → Done.
Available Tools (15)
Core Legal Research Tools (8)
Tool | Description |
| FTS5 search on 77,531 provisions with BM25 ranking |
| Retrieve specific provision by wet identifier + article number |
| FTS5 search on case law with court/date filters |
| Get linked Kamerstukken and memorie van toelichting for a statute |
| Validate citation against database (zero-hallucination check) |
| Aggregate citations from statutes, case law, prep works |
| Format citations per Dutch conventions (full/short/pinpoint) |
| Check if statute is in force, amended, or repealed |
EU Law Integration Tools (5)
Tool | Description |
| Get EU directives/regulations that a Dutch statute implements |
| Find Dutch laws implementing a specific EU act |
| Search EU documents with Dutch implementation counts |
| Get EU law references for a specific provision |
| Check implementation status (requires EU MCP) |
History & Metadata Tools (2)
Tool | Description |
| Retrieve a provision as it was at a specific historical date |
| List data sources with provenance, coverage, and freshness info |
EU Law Integration
Netherlands is a founding EU member state. Dutch law directly transposes EU directives across the full acquis communautaire.
Metric | Value |
EU Member State | Yes (founding member, since 1958) |
GDPR Status | Directly applicable; implemented by Uitvoeringswet AVG |
Key Implementation | AVG → Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming |
Competition Law | Mededingingswet implements EU Treaty Articles 101-102 |
ePrivacy | Telecommunicatiewet transposes ePrivacy Directive |
Dutch Law and EU Directives
AVG (GDPR) -- GDPR is directly applicable in the Netherlands. The Uitvoeringswet AVG implements the member-state derogations and supplements. The
get_eu_basistool links AVG provisions to the underlying GDPR articles.ePrivacy Directive -- transposed via the Telecommunicatiewet, governing electronic communications and cookie consent.
Competition law -- Mededingingswet aligns with EU Treaty Articles 101 (cartels) and 102 (abuse of dominance) and Commission enforcement practice.
Trade Secrets Directive -- implemented by Wet bescherming bedrijfsgeheimen (2018).
Financial regulation -- Wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft) transposes MiFID II, the Capital Requirements Directive, and related EU financial services directives.
The EU bridge tools provide bi-directional lookup: start from a Dutch provision to find its EU basis, or start from an EU directive to find its Dutch implementation.
See EU_INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md for detailed documentation.
Premium Tier
The free tier includes all 77,531 provisions with full-text search and EU cross-references. The premium tier adds case law, preparatory works, and version history.
Feature | Free | Premium |
Statute search (77,531 provisions) | Yes | Yes |
EU cross-references | Yes | Yes |
Citation validation | Yes | Yes |
Case law (59,261 rulings) | -- | Yes |
Preparatory works (2,994 documents) | -- | Yes |
Provision version history | -- | Yes |
Amendment diffs | -- | Yes |
Premium case law covers decisions from the Hoge Raad (Supreme Court), Gerechtshoven (Courts of Appeal), and Rechtbanken (District Courts) sourced from Rechtspraak.nl.
Premium preparatory works covers Kamerstukken (parliamentary documents), memorie van toelichting (explanatory memoranda), and other preparatory materials from Overheid.nl.
Premium is enabled via PREMIUM_ENABLED=true environment variable. Contact hello@ansvar.ai for access.
Data Sources & Freshness
All content is sourced from authoritative Dutch legal databases:
Wetten.overheid.nl -- Official consolidated statutes, Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid
Rechtspraak.nl -- Official court decisions database
Overheid.nl -- Official government publications portal
EUR-Lex -- Official EU law database (metadata)
Data Provenance
Field | Value |
Authority | Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid / Overheid.nl |
Retrieval method | Bulk download from Wetten.overheid.nl BWB API |
Language | Dutch (primary) |
License |
|
Coverage | 3,251 Dutch federal laws (100% BWB corpus) |
Last ingested | 2026-02-22 |
Automated Freshness Checks (Daily)
A daily GitHub Actions workflow monitors all data sources:
Source | Check | Method |
Statute amendments | Wetten.overheid.nl date comparison | All 3,251 statutes checked |
New statutes | BWB API publications (90-day window) | Diffed against database |
Case law | Rechtspraak.nl feed entry count | Compared to database |
Preparatory works | Overheid.nl Kamerstukken feed (30-day window) | New docs detected |
EU reference staleness | Git commit timestamps | Flagged if >90 days old |
Security
This project uses multiple layers of automated security scanning:
Scanner | What It Does | Schedule |
CodeQL | Static analysis for security vulnerabilities | Weekly + PRs |
Semgrep | SAST scanning (OWASP top 10, secrets, TypeScript) | Every push |
Gitleaks | Secret detection across git history | Every push |
Trivy | CVE scanning on filesystem and npm dependencies | Daily |
Docker Security | Container image scanning + SBOM generation | Daily |
Socket.dev | Supply chain attack detection | PRs |
OSSF Scorecard | OpenSSF best practices scoring | Weekly |
Dependabot | Automated dependency updates | Weekly |
See SECURITY.md for the full policy and vulnerability reporting.
Important Disclaimers
Legal Advice
THIS TOOL IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Statute text is sourced from official Wetten.overheid.nl publications. However:
This is a research tool, not a substitute for professional legal counsel
Court case coverage is limited -- do not rely solely on this for case law research
Verify critical citations against primary sources for court filings
EU cross-references are extracted from Dutch statute text and EUR-Lex metadata, not full EU law text
Municipal and provincial legislation is not included -- this covers national (rijks) legislation only
Before using professionally, read: DISCLAIMER.md | PRIVACY.md
Client Confidentiality
Queries go through the Claude API. For privileged or confidential matters (including attorney-client privilege under the Wet op de rechtsbijstand), use on-premise deployment. See PRIVACY.md for guidance on use in Dutch legal practice.
Documentation
EU Integration Guide -- Detailed EU cross-reference documentation
EU Usage Examples -- Practical EU lookup examples
Security Policy -- Vulnerability reporting and scanning details
Disclaimer -- Legal disclaimers and professional use notices
Privacy -- Client confidentiality and data handling
Development
Setup
git clone https://github.com/Ansvar-Systems/Dutch-law-mcp
cd Dutch-law-mcp
npm install
npm run build
npm testRunning Locally
npm run dev # Start MCP server (stdio)
npm run dev:http # Start HTTP server
npx @anthropic/mcp-inspector node dist/index.js # Test with MCP InspectorData Management
npm run ingest # Ingest statutes from Wetten.overheid.nl BWB API
npm run ingest:all # Full corpus ingest
npm run ingest:cases # Ingest case law from Rechtspraak.nl
npm run ingest:prep-works # Ingest Kamerstukken and preparatory works
npm run build:db # Rebuild free-tier SQLite database
npm run build:db:paid # Rebuild premium SQLite database
npm run drift:detect # Run drift detection against BWB anchors
npm run check-updates # Check for statute amendments
npm run extract:definitions # Extract legal definitions
npm run populate:xrefs # Populate EU cross-referencesPerformance
Search Speed: <100ms for most FTS5 queries
Database Size: 126 MB (efficient, portable)
Reliability: 100% ingestion success rate
More Ansvar MCPs
Full fleet coverage at ansvar.eu/coverage.
Contributing
Contributions welcome! See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.
Priority areas:
Court case law expansion (Hoge Raad, Gerechtshoven archive)
EU Regulations MCP integration (full EU law text, CJEU case law)
Historical statute versions and amendment tracking
Lower court decisions (Rechtbanken archives)
English translations for key statutes
Roadmap
Core statute database -- 3,251 Dutch statutes with FTS5 search (100% BWB coverage)
EU law integration -- cross-references to EU directives and regulations
Premium case law -- 59,261 Hoge Raad, Gerechtshoven, and Rechtbanken rulings
Premium preparatory works -- 2,994 Kamerstukken documents
Hetzner GHCR deployment -- Docker-based production hosting
npm package publication
Full Wetten.overheid.nl coverage -- 3,251 statutes, 77,531 provisions
Historical statute versions (amendment tracking)
Lower court coverage (Rechtbanken archives)
English translations for key statutes
Web API for programmatic access
Citation
If you use this MCP server in academic research:
@software{dutch_law_mcp_2026,
author = {Ansvar Systems AB},
title = {Dutch Law MCP Server: Production-Grade Legal Research Tool},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/Ansvar-Systems/Dutch-law-mcp},
note = {3,251 Dutch statutes with 77,531 provisions and EU law cross-references}
}License
Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE for details.
Data Licenses
Statutes & Legislation:
Dutch-Auteurswet-Art-11-- Dutch statutory public domain. Auteurswet Art. 11 (1912) states that no copyright subsists in laws, decrees or ordinances issued by public authorities, or in judicial or administrative decisions. Verified verbatim 2026-05-17 -- seedocs/audits/2026-05-17-eu-copyright-statutory-works-batch-1b-DE-IE-IT-NL-ES.md. Catalog entry:Dutch-Auteurswet-Art-11ininfrastructure/attribution-licenses.json.Case Law: Rechtspraak.nl -- same statutory basis (Auteurswet Art. 11 judicial-decision clause)
EU Metadata: EUR-Lex (EU public domain, Decision 2011/833/EU)
About Ansvar Systems
We build AI-accelerated compliance and legal research tools for the European market. This MCP server started as our internal reference tool for Dutch law -- turns out everyone building for the Dutch and EU market has the same research frustrations.
So we're open-sourcing it. Navigating 3,251 statutes and 77,531 provisions shouldn't require a law degree.
ansvar.eu -- Stockholm, Sweden
Available Tools
18 toolsaboutARead-only
Return server identity, version, data sources, and runtime capabilities. Use this tool to discover what tier and capabilities are available (free vs professional), which data sources are bundled, and the server version. Equivalent to reading the MCP resource case-law-stats://dutch-law-mcp/metadata but callable as a tool.
Inputs: no named parameters.
build_legal_stanceARead-only
Build a comprehensive legal stance on a topic by aggregating statute provisions, case law, preparatory works, and cross-references into a single structured response. Best for broad legal research questions. Gracefully degrades on free tier (omits case law and preparatory works). Use search_legislation or get_provision for targeted single-source queries instead.
Inputs: query (required), limit, as_of_date, document_id.
check_currencyARead-only
Check whether a Dutch statute or provision is currently in force (geldend recht). Returns status (in_force/repealed/not_yet_in_force), in-force date, and any warnings. Essential before relying on a provision — always check currency for legal advice. Optionally checks a specific provision and date. Also returns related case law cross-references when available.
Inputs: document_id (required), as_of_date, provision_ref.
check_data_freshnessARead-only
Check the freshness (age) of each data source in the bundled database. Returns last-updated timestamps and a fresh/stale/unknown status per source (statutes, case_law, eu_references). Use this before relying on legal data for time-sensitive analysis. Staleness thresholds: statutes 30 days, case_law 14 days, eu_references 90 days.
Inputs: source.
format_citationARead-only
Format a Dutch legal citation string into standard Dutch legal citation format. Pure formatting — no database lookup, no validation. Supports full (formal), short (abbreviated), and pinpoint (with subsection) formats. Use validate_citation instead if you need to verify the citation actually exists.
Inputs: citation (required), format.
get_dutch_implementationsARead-only
Reverse EU lookup: find which Dutch statutes implement a given EU directive or regulation. Returns BWB-IDs, statute titles, and implementation status. Use get_eu_basis for the forward lookup (Dutch law → EU basis). The eu_document_id format is "directive:YYYY/NNN" or "regulation:YYYY/NNN" (e.g. "directive:2016/679" for GDPR).
Inputs: eu_document_id (required), primary_only, in_force_only.
get_eu_basisARead-only
Get the EU legal basis (directives/regulations) for a Dutch statute. Returns CELEX numbers, EUR-Lex links, reference types (implements/references/supplements), and whether it is a primary implementation. Use get_provision_eu_basis for provision-level EU references. Use get_dutch_implementations for the reverse lookup (EU act → Dutch laws).
Inputs: document_id (required), reference_types, include_articles.
get_preparatory_worksARead-only
Get preparatory works (kamerstukken/travaux preparatoires) for a Dutch statute. Returns parliamentary documents: memorie van toelichting (MvT), memorie van antwoord (MvA), nota naar aanleiding van het verslag, and amendments. Professional tier only — free tier returns an upgrade notice. Use when you need legislative intent or historical context for a statute.
Inputs: statute_id (required), limit, document_type.
get_provisionARead-only
Retrieve a specific provision (article) from a Dutch statute by BWB-ID. Returns the full article text, metadata, and source URL. If no article is specified, returns all provisions of the statute (use with care — large statutes may have 100+ articles). Examples: document_id="BWBR0005289", book="6", article="162" for Art. 6:162 BW; document_id="BWBR0001854", article="287" for Art. 287 Sr. Use search_legislation if you don't know the BWB-ID. Use get_provision_at_date if you need a historical version.
Inputs: document_id (required), book, article, as_of_date, +1 more.
get_provision_at_dateARead-only
Retrieve a provision as it was at a specific historical date. Uses version history to return the text valid at that date. Essential for analyzing past legal situations or tracking how a provision changed over time. Set include_amendments=true to see the full amendment chain. Returns not_found if no version exists for that date. Use get_provision for the current version instead.
Inputs: date (required), document_id (required), provision_ref (required), include_amendments.
get_provision_eu_basisARead-only
Get EU references for a specific provision (article) in a Dutch statute. Shows which EU directive/regulation articles are referenced or implemented by that Dutch provision. More granular than get_eu_basis (which works at statute level). Returns empty results if no EU references exist for that provision.
Inputs: document_id (required), provision_ref (required).
list_sourcesARead-only
List the authoritative data sources backing this server. Returns provenance metadata for each source (wetten.overheid.nl, rechtspraak.nl, EUR-Lex) including coverage, licensing, freshness, and update frequency. Use this tool to verify data origin and understand what data is available. Set include_stats=true to get row counts per table.
Inputs: include_stats.
search_case_lawARead-only
Search Dutch court decisions from rechtspraak.nl (202K+ decisions). Returns ECLI identifier, court, date, summary, and keywords. Supports FTS search with filters for court, legal domain, procedure type, and date range. For direct ECLI lookup, use the ecli parameter instead of query. Note: case law is only available in the professional tier — free tier returns an upgrade notice. Returns empty array when no results match.
Inputs: ecli, court, limit, query, +4 more.
search_eu_implementationsARead-only
Search EU directives and regulations in the database (1,008 documents). Returns EU document metadata with Dutch implementation counts. Filter by type (directive/regulation), year range, community (EU/EG/EEG), and whether a Dutch implementation exists. Use when browsing EU instruments rather than looking up a specific one.
Inputs: type, limit, query, year_to, +3 more.
search_legislationARead-only
Search Dutch statutes and regulations by keyword using full-text search (FTS5 with BM25 ranking). Data sourced from wetten.overheid.nl (BWB). Returns matching provisions with article text, statute title, and BWB-ID. Use document_id to narrow to a specific statute. Use as_of_date to query historical versions. Returns empty array (not error) when no results match. Use get_provision instead when you already know the exact BWB-ID and article number.
Inputs: query (required), limit, status, as_of_date, +1 more.
search_parliamentary_proceedingsARead-only
Search Dutch parliamentary proceedings (Tweede Kamer/Handelingen) from the ParlaMint-NL corpus. Returns floor speeches, motions, and debate transcripts with speaker metadata. Useful for understanding legislative intent, political debate context, and parliamentary questions on specific topics. Supports FTS search with date range filters. Note: this data covers Tweede Kamer speeches only, not Eerste Kamer. Professional tier only — free tier returns an upgrade notice. Returns empty array when no results match.
Inputs: query (required), limit, date_to, date_from.
validate_citationARead-only
Validate a Dutch legal citation against the database — checks whether the referenced document and provision actually exist. Use this to verify citations before including them in legal analysis (zero-hallucination check). Supported formats: "Art. 6:162 BW", "art. 287 Sr", "ECLI:NL:HR:2019:376", "Kamerstukken II 2020/21, 35815, nr. 2". Returns validation status with details on what was/wasn't found. Use format_citation instead if you just need to format a citation string.
Inputs: citation (required).
validate_eu_complianceARead-only
Validate EU compliance for a Dutch statute. Checks for missing, partial, or outdated implementations of EU directives/regulations. Returns compliance issues with severity levels (high/medium/low) and recommendations in Dutch. Optionally narrow to a specific provision or EU document. Use get_eu_basis first to see what EU instruments apply.
Inputs: document_id (required), provision_ref, eu_document_id.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: statute retrieval vs EU basis vs case law vs parliamentary proceedings vs citation handling. Cross-references in descriptions (e.g., get_eu_basis vs get_provision_eu_basis) further clarify granularity. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
Nearly all tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_provision, search_legislation, check_currency, validate_citation). The only oddity is 'about', but it is a common metadata name and does not disrupt the overall coherence. All use snake_case uniformly.
At 18 tools, the set is slightly above the typical 3-15 range for a well-scoped server, but each tool serves a distinct purpose in a comprehensive legal research domain. The count is justified given the breadth of Dutch law sources (statutes, case law, parliamentary, EU, citations) and metadata/utility tools.
The tool surface covers all major legal research needs for Dutch law: statute search/retrieval/history, currency checking, case law, parliamentary proceedings, preparatory works, EU law tracing and compliance, citation formatting/validation, and structured aggregation. Minor gaps like full-text case law download are mitigated via parameters (e.g., ECLI lookup) or are outside the apparent scope.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Dutch legal AI for law firms: answers from Dutch case law, legislation and EU law, with citations.
Resolve, search and verify legal citations against the official sources, with provenance.
Official MCP connector for Legalize: read and search its whole open corpus, at any point in time.
Connect AI to millions of laws and court cases with the Lawstronaut MCP.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying 6,870 German federal statutes, case law, and legislative preparatory works directly from AI assistants and MCP-compatible clients.356 npm4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Austrian federal law (Bundesrecht) to LLMs, enabling full-text search, paragraph retrieval, historical versions, statute lookup, BGBl lookups, amendment timelines, and citation searches via the public RIS OGD API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve French legislation, case law, and EU law integrations from official sources via MCP.99 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for Dutch consolidated legislation, enabling AI agents to retrieve acts and their full text in force on a given date with verifiable citations via the official KOOP SRU API.6115 PyPI1Apache 2.0