Skip to main content
Glama
Ansvar-Systems

Dutch-law-mcp

by Ansvar-Systems
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Dutch-law-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • nl-eli-mcp

      matematicsolutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Dutch consolidated legislation, enabling AI agents to retrieve acts and their full text in force on a given date with verifiable citations via the official KOOP SRU API.
      6
      43 PyPI
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • ris-mcp

      noahpfi
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes Austrian federal law (Bundesrecht) to LLMs, enabling full-text search, paragraph retrieval, historical versions, statute lookup, BGBl lookups, amendment timelines, and citation searches via the public RIS OGD API.
      -

    • Aliado Libre

      fabiangulla-pixel
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants via MCP to Colombian legislation and jurisprudence with verifiable citations. Enables hybrid search over a local index of over 44,000 legal documents, returning exact, sourced quotes without generating text.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: statute retrieval vs EU basis vs case law vs parliamentary proceedings vs citation handling. Cross-references in descriptions (e.g., get_eu_basis vs get_provision_eu_basis) further clarify granularity. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Nearly all tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_provision, search_legislation, check_currency, validate_citation). The only oddity is 'about', but it is a common metadata name and does not disrupt the overall coherence. All use snake_case uniformly.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 18 tools, the set is slightly above the typical 3-15 range for a well-scoped server, but each tool serves a distinct purpose in a comprehensive legal research domain. The count is justified given the breadth of Dutch law sources (statutes, case law, parliamentary, EU, citations) and metadata/utility tools.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers all major legal research needs for Dutch law: statute search/retrieval/history, currency checking, case law, parliamentary proceedings, preparatory works, EU law tracing and compliance, citation formatting/validation, and structured aggregation. Minor gaps like full-text case law download are mitigated via parameters (e.g., ECLI lookup) or are outside the apparent scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources