Skip to main content
Glama
laszlopere

mcp-abacus

solver

Find variable values that drive an expression to a root or extremum (min/max). Supports single and multiple unknowns with various search algorithms.

Instructions

Find the value(s) of one or more variables that drive an expression to a root or extremum.

solver takes the SAME expression language as calculate — every operator, function, literal form, and (crucially) multi-line programs with name = expr assignments — but instead of evaluating the expression it SEARCHES for the value of the unknown(s) that drive the expression to the chosen objective:

  • "find-root" (default): find where the expression equals zero. Write an equation f = g as the expression f - g and find its root.

  • "find-minimum" / "find-maximum": find where the expression reaches its smallest / largest value within the bracket(s).

There are two input forms for the unknowns:

  • SINGLE: variable + lower + upper — one unknown searched over the bracket [lower, upper] (lower must be below upper). This is the default golden-section engine.

  • MULTIPLE: variables — a dict mapping each unknown name to its [lower, upper] bracket, e.g. {"x": [0, 5], "y": [-4, 2]}. This needs the Nelder-Mead engine (algorithm="nelder-mead"), which searches all the unknowns jointly. Give exactly one of the two forms. Each unknown must OCCUR in the expression and must NOT be assigned by it; every OTHER name is a constant the program sets via an assignment line (e.g. "r = 0.05\np = 1000\np * (1 + r)**n - 2000" solving for n with r, p fixed). A name that is neither an unknown nor assigned is an error.

objective (optional) names what to search for — "find-root", "find-minimum", or "find-maximum"; omitted, it defaults to "find-root". (The older spellings solve, minimise/maximise and their min/max and American forms are accepted too.)

algorithm (optional) names the search engine — "golden-section-search" (the default, single-variable), "brent-parabolic" (single-variable too, parabolic interpolation with a golden-section fallback — usually faster on smooth extrema), or "nelder-mead" (multivariate, a bounds-clamped downhill simplex). The two single-variable engines solve only the SINGLE form; the variables form requires "nelder-mead". (golden, brent, simplex and a few other spellings are accepted too.)

mode and min_fixed_point_precision behave exactly as in calculate: the search runs in that numeric type, and the found value is reported in it. See calculate and help for the shared grammar, modes, and precision rules.

The search is bounded by a hard 2-second time limit. If it has not converged by then it stops and reports the best value reached so far (a find-root that has not got close enough to zero in that time is reported as no-solution, naming the limit).

Returns a dict: solutions is a list of {variable, solution, solution_hex_dump}, one per unknown in input order — each solution rendered and marked "(approximate)" (the search locates it to a tolerance, never exactly), with its bit-backed hex. For the SINGLE form the scalar variable / solution / solution_hex_dump are also set (the one unknown); for the MULTIPLE form those scalars are null and solutions carries every value. value is the EXPRESSION evaluated at that solution, annotated with its own precision verdict (near zero for find-root, the extremum otherwise), and value_hex_dump its hex. mode is the resolved numeric type; exact and precision describe value exactly as in calculate. objective echoes the resolved objective, algorithm names the engine used, and iterations is how many search steps it took. On any failure — a bad mode/precision, a malformed expression, an invalid request (no/both input forms, empty bracket, unknown not in the expression, golden-section asked for multiple unknowns, unknown objective or algorithm), or no solution in the bracket — every data field is null and error carries the message (a no-solution error reports the closest |expr| it reached); on success error is null.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
expressionYes
variableNo
lowerNo
upperNo
variablesNo
objectiveNo
algorithmNo
modeNofixed-point
min_fixed_point_precisionNo
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description fully discloses behavioral traits: a hard 2-second time limit, behavior on convergence failure (returns best value or no-solution), return structure with hex dumps, and error handling. No contradictions with missing annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but well-structured with sections, bold headings, and examples. Every sentence adds value. It could be slightly more concise (e.g., the multiple spellings note), but it remains clear and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, yet the description completely details the return dict, including fields like 'solutions', 'value', 'mode', and error handling. It also references sibling 'calculate' for shared grammar, compensating for the lack of output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description adds rich semantics for all 9 parameters: explains expression language (shared with calculate), input forms (single vs multiple variables), objective options, algorithm choices, mode and precision. It goes well beyond schema types, providing usage details and constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool finds variable values driving an expression to a root/extremum, explicitly distinguishing it from sibling 'calculate' (which evaluates directly). The verb 'find' and resource 'values of variables that drive an expression' are specific and non-tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance on when to use single vs multiple variable forms, which algorithm to choose (golden-section, brent-parabolic, nelder-mead), and what conditions each requires. It also warns against invalid inputs (e.g., no/both forms, unknown not in expression) and explains error outcomes.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/laszlopere/mcp-abacus'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server