info
Report mcp-abacus server availability, version, and environment information.
Instructions
Report mcp-abacus server availability, version, and environment information.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Report mcp-abacus server availability, version, and environment information.
Report mcp-abacus server availability, version, and environment information.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations, but description fully discloses output contents (availability, version, environment). Implicitly read-only; no side effects mentioned but reasonable to assume.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no fluff; every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Complete for simple tool; could optionally mention return format but not necessary given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters; baseline score of 4 applies as description adds no parameter details beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly specifies the tool reports server availability, version, and environment information, using specific nouns that distinguish it from siblings like analyze, calculate, help, solver.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage: use when needing server info. No explicit guidance on when not to use or comparison to siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/laszlopere/mcp-abacus'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server