KiCad MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to KiCad MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA typed Model Context Protocol server that exposes KiCad 10 EDA workflows to language-model clients through validated tool calls.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with KiCAD for PCB design automation.65 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes KiCad PCB design automation tools to AI assistants and other MCP clients.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAI-powered MCP server for KiCad that enables creating and modifying schematics, searching components, managing hierarchical projects, generating PCB placement, routing boards locally, and creating copper pours through natural language.2266 npm14MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to analyze schematics, inspect PCBs, trace connections, validate designs, and generate embedded code for KiCad projects.39131MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with KiCad projects, schematics, and PCBs, supporting project management, design rule checking, netlist extraction, and datasheet RAG search.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
There is significant overlap between several tools, particularly in the analysis and extraction categories. For example, analyze_schematic_connections and find_component_connections both deal with connections, while extract_project_netlist and extract_schematic_netlist have unclear boundaries. However, the descriptions help clarify some distinctions, preventing complete confusion.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., analyze_bom, export_bom_csv, list_projects), which is clear and predictable. There are minor deviations like get_drc_history_tool (redundant 'tool' suffix) and generate_pcb_thumbnail (slightly different structure), but overall the naming is coherent and readable.
With 16 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a KiCad server covering project management, analysis, and export functions. It feels comprehensive rather than bloated, though some consolidation might improve focus. The scope justifies most tools, but it borders on being heavy.
The toolset covers key areas like project listing, validation, analysis, and export, with good lifecycle coverage for KiCad workflows. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct PCB editing or schematic modification tools, but agents can likely work around these with the provided analysis and validation tools for a complete design process.