Listar receitas

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full behavioral disclosure burden. It only states the basic listing action and filter availability, but does not disclose read-only nature, permissions, pagination, limits, return format, or any other behavioral traits beyond the visible action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the primary action and lists optional filters. No unnecessary words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and the description covers the core listing and filter capability. However, given the absence of annotations and output schema, the description should provide more context about expected output, usage boundaries, or alternatives to be fully complete. It is adequate but has clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description merely restates the filter dimensions (category, difficulty, ingredient, free search) without adding new meaning or clarifying syntax, format, or usage nuances beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Lista' (lits) and the resource 'receitas' (recipes), indicating a listing operation with optional filters. It distinguishes from most siblings like 'adicionar_receita' and 'remover_receita', but does not explicitly differentiate from 'buscar_receita' given the 'busca livre' filter, which could overlap in purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'buscar_receita' or 'sugerir_por_ingredientes'. It only mentions optional filters without explaining scenarios where one tool would be preferred over another.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.