Buscar receita por id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states that the tool 'returns all details', which conveys a read-only operation and the scope of the response. It does not disclose error behavior for missing ids or the exact return structure, but for a simple retrieval this is reasonably transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the purpose ('Retorna todos os detalhes') and the target resource. Every word earns its place with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description sufficiently covers purpose and usage. The phrase 'todos os detalhes' gives an overview of return value, though it could be more specific about the response structure or behavior when the id does not exist. Overall, adequate for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema documentation covers 100% of the parameters (id) with a clear example ('brigadeiro'). The tool description merely echoes the schema by saying 'a partir do seu id', adding no extra semantic meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate given full schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Retorna' (returns) and identifies the resource 'receita' (recipe) with its id, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like listar_receitas, adicionar_receita, remover_receita, and sugerir_por_ingredientes. This is a focused single-recipe-by-id retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies clear usage: when you have a recipe id and need all its details. It does not explicitly contrast with listar_receitas or provide exclusions, but the context is unambiguous from the title and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.