Skip to main content
Glama
l0kifs

project-explorer-mcp

by l0kifs

Related Servers

Alternatives to project-explorer-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides deep structural analysis of Python source code via AST, including function signatures, call graphs, cyclomatic complexity, code smells, dead code detection, and protocol conformance.
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Analyzes codebases and extracts all symbols (functions, classes, methods, interfaces, etc.) from 10+ programming languages into LLM-optimized markdown format. Enables AI assistants to understand entire project structures efficiently without processing full source code.
      2
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Analyzes source code structure across multiple languages using tree-sitter, extracting classes, functions, methods, and metadata with precise line numbers for efficient codebase exploration and AI-assisted development.
      8
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to analyze Python repositories structurally via AST and call graphs, providing code search, symbol lookup, change-impact analysis, workflow tracing, and explanation without embeddings.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource: directory tree, Python code structure, Markdown structure, and OpenAPI operations (list vs. details). There is no overlap in purpose, and the descriptions clearly specify when to use each tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a descriptive prefix (dir, python, markdown, openapi), but the verb placement differs: 'python_outline' and 'markdown_outline' are noun-phrases, while 'openapi_list_operations' and 'openapi_get_operation_details' use verb + object. This is readable and somewhat predictable, but not perfectly consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a project explorer, covering directory trees, Python and Markdown outlines, and OpenAPI exploration. Each tool serves a distinct purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides good coverage of structural exploration for a project, including directory hierarchy, Python and Markdown outlines, and OpenAPI operations with both listing and detailed views. It lacks support for other file types (e.g., JavaScript, JSON), but this appears to be an intentional scope limitation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues