lol-cdp
Related Servers
Alternatives to lol-cdp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to observe and control local browsers and desktop applications over MCP, including reading UI elements and differences, capturing images, and performing permitted clicks, typing, selections, scrolling, and multi-window operations.162MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients on Windows to control the local mouse, keyboard, and screen understanding via MCP stdio, allowing automated workflows like viewing the screen, locating elements, clicking, typing, and verifying results.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive computer control capabilities including mouse and keyboard automation, screen capture, OCR text recognition, and window management through MCP protocol.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI platforms to see the screen and operate any desktop software through real mouse clicks, text input, key presses, and scripted scenario execution.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to observe and control Windows desktop applications by reading UIA element trees and capturing screenshots, then acting through UIA patterns or synthesized mouse and keyboard input. It runs standalone on an interactive Windows session, without requiring the original host application.1-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAllows AI clients to see and control Windows 10/11 desktops via MCP, with screenshots, UI Automation, Chrome CDP, keyboard/mouse, and terminal using semantic element targeting.301,685 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct roles, with a sensible layering of observe (state, snapshot, query, screenshot), act (click, hover, type, key, scroll, navigate), and extend (eval, script, css). A few pairs could be confused at a glance — snapshot vs query (list vs detail), eval vs script (one-shot vs persistent injection), state vs map (live vs crawled) — but the descriptions draw the boundaries explicitly.
All names are single lowercase snake_case tokens (wait_for, lcu_endpoints), with no camelCase mixing. The set mixes nouns for read-only inspectors (console, network, metrics, map) with verbs for actions (click, hover, type, navigate), which is a defensible and readable pattern rather than a chaotic one.
21 tools is on the heavy side, but each covers a genuinely separate capability of client automation (input, DOM inspection, navigation, LCU access, JS injection, diagnostics). Nothing looks like a redundant duplicate of another tool, so the count is justified by scope even if it sits near the upper bound.
The surface covers the full loop: inspect state, take snapshots, act with real input, wait, verify via console/network/metrics, and extend via eval/script/css plus direct LCU calls and an endpoint catalog. Minor gaps exist — no drag/double-click or multi-step form fill, no console/network clearing or filtering — but these are workaroundable via eval or repeated calls.