Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to run402-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure PostgreSQL MCP server allowing AI models to read, write, update, and delete database records with parameterized queries, transactional dry-runs, disposable testing, and automated backups.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely interact with PostgreSQL databases through a standardized MCP interface, supporting SQL queries, schema inspection, and database management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables governed access to corporate Postgres databases via MCP, supporting read-only queries, confirmed data and schema changes, query explanation, audit trail retrieval, and role-based policies with optional Vault secret integration.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An extensible MCP server for database operations that supports PostgreSQL for managing schemas, tables, data, and user permissions. It features automatic migration recording for DDL changes and integrates with various AI-powered editors like Cursor, Zed, and Claude Code.
      8 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A general-purpose PostgreSQL MCP server with full read-write SQL access, atomic multi-statement transactions, and schema inspection. Works with any PostgreSQL instance — local, Supabase, AWS RDS, or self-hosted — and connects to Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP-compatible AI client.
      202 npm
      3
      ISC

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 198 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    With 198 tools, many have overlapping or confusingly similar purposes. For example, status, service_status, tier_status, and get_operator_status all sound similar despite different scopes, and a large number of deploy_*, project_*, and notification_* tools create high ambiguity. The detailed descriptions help, but the sheer volume and close names make misselection likely.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are inconsistent: some tools use verb_first (list_projects, create_org), others use noun_first (assets_put, jobs_submit, domains_get), and there are one-off names like init, status, and whoami. Prefixes like mailbox_ and contract_ are not used uniformly across related tools (e.g., create_mailbox vs list_mailboxes vs get_mailbox). This mixed style reduces predictability.

    Tool Count1/5

    198 tools is an extreme mismatch for any MCP server scope, far exceeding the typical 3-15 well-scoped tools. Even for a comprehensive platform like Run402, this count is overwhelming and impractical for an agent to navigate effectively. The set could be consolidated or split into focused servers.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set is remarkably comprehensive, covering project lifecycle, deployments, functions, storage, auth, email, billing, notifications, and more. There are minor gaps, such as no direct tool to list/delete project auth users and no organization deletion operation, but the overall surface covers the domain thoroughly.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive