Skip to main content
Glama
kurtzhi

fsext-mcp-server-python

by kurtzhi

Related Servers

Alternatives to fsext-mcp-server-python

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server providing HTTP endpoints for AI agent tool execution, including file system operations, shell commands, and LLM-based code generation.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with file systems, databases, GitHub repositories, web resources, and system tools while maintaining security and control.
      23 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to perform comprehensive file operations including finding, reading, writing, editing, searching, moving, and copying files with security validations.
      7
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready Model Context Protocol suite over Streamable HTTP providing a sandboxed file server with tools, resources, prompts, and both manual and AI-driven clients.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides secure and intelligent interaction with files and filesystems, offering smart context management and token-efficient operations for working with large files and complex directory structures.
      21
      67
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct, but the three search tools (fs_search_files_by_content, fs_search_in_files_by_content, fs_search_in_file_by_content) have highly overlapping descriptions and could easily be misselected. Additionally, fs_read_full_text and fs_read_text_range are similar, though they differ by range.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The 'fs_' prefix is consistent, and most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., fs_delete_file, fs_create_file). However, image tools use noun_verb (fs_image_resize, fs_image_crop) and fs_ocr_extract_text deviates, while fs_is_file_exists uses a predicate structure. This mixed convention creates inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 22 tools, the server is slightly heavy but each tool fills a specific niche (files, directories, text, binary, search, images, OCR). The count is on the higher end of reasonable but not excessive for the broad domain.

    Completeness2/5

    File operations are well-covered, but directory operations are missing create and delete functionality. There is no fs_create_directory or fs_delete_directory, which forces agents to work around these gaps. This is a significant omission for a filesystem server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues