Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ClaudeX

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent local memory for Claude Code that indexes every session's JSONL file verbatim into SQLite + ChromaDB. Exposes 17 MCP tools for semantic recall, deterministic file replay, and fuzzy "do you remember when..." queries across your entire session history — no API calls, nothing leaves the machine.
      17
      128 PyPI
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, searchable memory for Claude Code using local SQLite, semantic embeddings, and full-text search, enabling Claude to recall and retrieve context across sessions and projects without external services.
      6 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for Claude Code. Automatically indexes every conversation and provides production-grade hybrid search (BM25 + vectors + reranker) via MCP tools. 100% local, zero config, zero API keys, zero invoice.
      16
      34 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code. Store, search, and retrieve memories across sessions using hybrid vector + keyword search powered by SQLite, FTS5, and sqlite-vec.
      20 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose. Overlap exists between list_memories and recall_memory, but they serve different retrieval needs (stats vs. priority/recency). Similarly, get_session_summary is a cheaper alternative to get_session. Overall, no two tools are ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., delete_memory, list_sessions, search_conversations). The pattern is predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is appropriate for this domain, covering memory management, session tracking, and project awareness. Each tool serves a necessary function without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core lifecycle of memories (create, read, delete) and sessions (list, read, search, summarize). A minor gap is the lack of an explicit memory update tool, though store_memory can overwrite. Overall, the surface is complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues