Skip to main content
Glama
deenesjakoruzh
kukapay

crypto-projects-mcp

by kukapay
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

加密项目 MCP 服务器

一个 MCP 服务器，向 AI 代理提供来自Mobula.io 的加密货币项目数据。

执照Python地位

特征

  • 获取项目数据：从 Mobula 检索全面的项目详细信息（例如市场数据、代币经济学和链接）。

  • 结构化输出：将项目数据格式化为组织良好的 Markdown 文档，其中包含概述、市场数据、投资者、交易所、代币分发和发布时间表等部分。

  • 语言支持：根据系统区域设置或用户指定的设置自定义输出语言。

Related MCP server: crypto-news-mcp

安装

先决条件

  • Python 3.10 或更高版本

  • uv用于包管理和运行项目

  • Mobula API 访问（公共端点无需身份验证）

设置

  1. 克隆存储库：

    git clone https://github.com/kukapay/crypto-projects-mcp.git
cd crypto-projects-mcp

  2. 安装依赖项：

    uv sync

用法

以开发模式运行

使用 MCP 检查器测试服务器：

uv run mcp dev main.py

与 Claude Desktop 集成

在 Claude Desktop 中安装服务器以进行 LLM 交互：

uv run mcp install main.py --name "Crypto Projects"

交互示例

服务器提供两个主要接口：一个用于获取原始数据的工具和一个将其格式化为结构化 Markdown 文档的提示。

1.使用get_project_data工具

get_project_data工具用于检索指定加密货币项目的原始 JSON 数据。这对于需要未处理数据的应用程序非常有用。

await get_project_data("avalanche")

这将返回一个字典，其中包含 Avalanche 的价格、市值、区块链和社交链接等详细信息。示例输出：

{
  "name": "Avalanche",
  "symbol": "AVAX",
  "blockchains":  ["Avalanche C-Chain"],
  "price": 35.12,
  "market_cap": 1234567890,
  ...
}

2. 使用format_project_data提示符

format_project_data提示符使用get_project_data工具获取数据，并将其格式化为完整的 Markdown 文档。此提示符专为 LLM 申请设计，用于呈现有关加密货币项目的结构化、易于理解的信息。

# format_project_data("avalanche")                 # use system locale
format_project_data("avalanche", lang="en_US")     # use en_US

这将生成一个包含详细章节的 Markdown 文档。Avalanche 的示例输出：

# Avalanche Project Information

## Overview
- **Name**: Avalanche
- **Symbol**: AVAX
- **Chain**: Avalanche C-Chain
- **Contract Address**: 0xb31f66aa3c1e785363f0875a1b74e27b85fd66c7
- **Audit Report**: https://quantstamp.com/blog/quantstamp-enhancing-the-security-of-avalanche
- **Description**: Avalanche is a high throughput smart contract blockchain platform. Validators secure the network through a proof-of-stake consensus protocol. It is said to be fast, low cost, and environmental friendly.

## Market Data
- **Price**: $19.45
- **Market Cap**: $8,130,398,992
- **Volume (24h)**: $48,238,792
- **Total Supply**: 454,405,245
- **Circulating Supply**: 417,951,478

## Links
- **Website**: https://www.avax.network
- **Twitter**: https://twitter.com/avax
- **Discord**: https://www.avax.network/

## Investors
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Polychain Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Polychain Capital is a cryptocurrency-focused investment management firm and hedge fund.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Dragonfly Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Dragonfly Capital Partners is a venture capital firm that focuses on investments in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Bitmain
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Bitmain is a China-based technology company that specializes in the design and manufacture of hardware for cryptocurrency mining.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Galaxy
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Galaxy is a digital asset and blockchain leader helping institutions, startups, and qualified individuals shape a changing economy.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: NGC Ventures (NEO Global Capital)
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: NGC Ventures is one of the largest institutional investors of blockchain technologies.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Initialized Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Not available
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Three Arrows Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Not available
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: a16z (Andreessen Horowitz)
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Andreessen Horowitz is a prominent venture capital firm based in Menlo Park, California.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Fundamental Labs
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: An investment company specialized in Blockchain sector.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Lemniscap
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Lemniscap is an investment firm specializing in investments in emerging cryptoassets and blockchain companies.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Naval Ravikant
- **Type**: Angel Investor
- **Description**: Naval Ravikant is the CEO and a co-founder of AngelList.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: MetaStable Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Manage Crypto Asset Hedge Funds.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: LedgerPrime
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: LedgerPrime is a quantitative and systematic digital asset investment firm.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Digital Asset Capital Management (DACM)
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Specialist, global investment manager in the digital asset sector.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: HashKey Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: HashKey Capital is a blockchain and cryptocurrency-focused venture capital and investment firm.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Balaji Srinivasan
- **Type**: Angel Investor
- **Description**: Balaji S. Srinivasan is the CTO of Coinbase and cofounder of Counsyl, Earn, Teleport, and Coin Center.

## Exchanges
- Binance: AVAX/USDT
- Coinbase: AVAX/USD
- OKX: AVAX/USDT
- Bybit: AVAX/USDT
- Kraken: AVAX/EUR
- WhiteBIT: Not available
- HTX: Not available
- P2B: Not available
- KuCoin: Not available
- Bitunix: Not available

## Token Distribution
- Foundation: 9.26%
- Airdrop: 2.5%
- Team: 10%
- Public Sale Option A1: 1%
- Public Sale Option A2: 8.3%
- Public Sale Option B: 0.67%
- Community and Development Endowment: 7%
- Testnet Incentive Program: 0.31%
- Strategic Partners: 5%
- Staking Rewards: 50%
- Private Sale: 3.46%
- Seed Sale: 2.5%

## Token Release Schedule
- Sep 2020: 40,466,016 tokens (Seed Round, Private Sale, Public Sales, etc.)
- Dec 2020: 45,188,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Mar 2021: 45,188,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Jun 2021: 45,188,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Sep 2021: 19,502,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Dec 2021: 19,502,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Mar 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Jun 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Sep 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Dec 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Mar 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Jun 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Sep 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Dec 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Mar 2024: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Jun 2024: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Sep 2024: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Dec 2024: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2030: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)

执照

本项目遵循 MIT 许可证。详情请参阅LICENSE文件。

Available Tools

1 tool
get_project_dataC
Fetch cryptocurrency project data from Mobula API.

Args:
    token_symbol (str): The symbol of the cryptocurrency token (e.g., 'BTC', 'ETH')

Returns:
    dict: Raw JSON response from Mobula API containing project details
ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
token_symbolYes

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the API source and return format, but lacks details on error handling, rate limits, authentication needs, or whether it's read-only/destructive. This leaves significant gaps for a tool interacting with an external API.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized with three sentences: purpose, parameter explanation, and return value. It's front-loaded with the main action and avoids unnecessary details, though the structure could be slightly more polished.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and low schema coverage, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the response structure beyond 'raw JSON', error cases, or API limitations, which is inadequate for a tool fetching external data.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning by explaining the parameter's purpose (cryptocurrency token symbol) and providing examples ('BTC', 'ETH'), which helps beyond the bare schema. However, it doesn't cover constraints like valid symbols or format details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Fetch') and resource ('cryptocurrency project data from Mobula API'), making the purpose understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from siblings since none exist, so it can't achieve the highest score for sibling distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or context for its application. It only states what it does without usage instructions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev1.0.0
    • First observedget_project_data
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

B3/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (get_project_data), and with no other tools to compare, consistency is inherently perfect.

Tool Count2/5

One tool is too few for a server named 'crypto-projects-mcp', which suggests a broader scope. This minimal set severely limits functionality, as it only supports fetching data without any create, update, delete, or search operations.

Completeness1/5

The tool surface is severely incomplete for the implied domain of cryptocurrency projects. It lacks essential operations like listing projects, searching, updating, or deleting data, making it inadequate for typical agent workflows in this domain.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers