Skip to main content
Glama
deenesjakoruzh
kukapay

crypto-projects-mcp

by kukapay
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Crypto Projects MCP 서버

Mobula.io 에서 AI 에이전트로 암호화폐 프로젝트 데이터를 제공하는 MCP 서버입니다.

특허파이썬상태

특징

  • 프로젝트 데이터 가져오기 : Mobula에서 포괄적인 프로젝트 세부 정보(예: 시장 데이터, 토큰 경제학, 링크)를 검색합니다.

  • 구조화된 출력 : 개요, 시장 데이터, 투자자, 거래소, 토큰 배포, 출시 일정에 대한 섹션으로 프로젝트 데이터를 잘 정리된 마크다운 문서로 형식화합니다.

  • 언어 지원 : 시스템 로케일이나 사용자 지정 설정에 따라 출력 언어를 사용자 정의합니다.

Related MCP server: crypto-news-mcp

설치

필수 조건

  • Python 3.10 이상

  • 패키지 관리 및 프로젝트 실행을 위한 uv

  • Mobula API 액세스(공개 엔드포인트에 대한 인증 필요 없음)

설정

  1. 저장소 복제 :

    지엑스피1

  2. 종속성 설치 :

    uv sync

용법

개발 모드에서 실행

MCP Inspector를 사용하여 서버를 테스트합니다.

uv run mcp dev main.py

Claude Desktop과 통합

LLM 상호작용을 위해 Claude Desktop에 서버를 설치하세요.

uv run mcp install main.py --name "Crypto Projects"

예시 상호작용

서버는 두 가지 주요 인터페이스를 제공합니다. 원시 데이터를 가져오는 도구 와 이를 구조화된 마크다운 문서로 포맷하는 프롬프트입니다 .

1. get_project_data 도구 사용

get_project_data 도구는 지정된 암호화폐 프로젝트의 원시 JSON 데이터를 검색합니다. 처리되지 않은 데이터가 필요한 애플리케이션에 유용합니다.

await get_project_data("avalanche")

이 함수는 Avalanche의 가격, 시가총액, 블록체인, 소셜 링크 등의 세부 정보가 포함된 사전을 반환합니다. 출력 예시:

{
  "name": "Avalanche",
  "symbol": "AVAX",
  "blockchains":  ["Avalanche C-Chain"],
  "price": 35.12,
  "market_cap": 1234567890,
  ...
}

2. format_project_data 프롬프트 사용

format_project_data 프롬프트는 get_project_data 도구를 사용하여 데이터를 가져와 포괄적인 마크다운 문서로 포맷합니다. 이 프롬프트는 LLM 애플리케이션에서 암호화폐 프로젝트에 대한 구조적이고 사람이 읽을 수 있는 정보를 제공하도록 설계되었습니다.

# format_project_data("avalanche")                 # use system locale
format_project_data("avalanche", lang="en_US")     # use en_US

이렇게 하면 자세한 섹션이 포함된 마크다운 문서가 생성됩니다. Avalanche 출력 예시:

# Avalanche Project Information

## Overview
- **Name**: Avalanche
- **Symbol**: AVAX
- **Chain**: Avalanche C-Chain
- **Contract Address**: 0xb31f66aa3c1e785363f0875a1b74e27b85fd66c7
- **Audit Report**: https://quantstamp.com/blog/quantstamp-enhancing-the-security-of-avalanche
- **Description**: Avalanche is a high throughput smart contract blockchain platform. Validators secure the network through a proof-of-stake consensus protocol. It is said to be fast, low cost, and environmental friendly.

## Market Data
- **Price**: $19.45
- **Market Cap**: $8,130,398,992
- **Volume (24h)**: $48,238,792
- **Total Supply**: 454,405,245
- **Circulating Supply**: 417,951,478

## Links
- **Website**: https://www.avax.network
- **Twitter**: https://twitter.com/avax
- **Discord**: https://www.avax.network/

## Investors
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Polychain Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Polychain Capital is a cryptocurrency-focused investment management firm and hedge fund.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Dragonfly Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Dragonfly Capital Partners is a venture capital firm that focuses on investments in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Bitmain
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Bitmain is a China-based technology company that specializes in the design and manufacture of hardware for cryptocurrency mining.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Galaxy
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Galaxy is a digital asset and blockchain leader helping institutions, startups, and qualified individuals shape a changing economy.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: NGC Ventures (NEO Global Capital)
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: NGC Ventures is one of the largest institutional investors of blockchain technologies.
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Initialized Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Not available
- **Lead Investor**: Yes
- **Name**: Three Arrows Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Not available
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: a16z (Andreessen Horowitz)
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Andreessen Horowitz is a prominent venture capital firm based in Menlo Park, California.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Fundamental Labs
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: An investment company specialized in Blockchain sector.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Lemniscap
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Lemniscap is an investment firm specializing in investments in emerging cryptoassets and blockchain companies.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Naval Ravikant
- **Type**: Angel Investor
- **Description**: Naval Ravikant is the CEO and a co-founder of AngelList.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: MetaStable Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Manage Crypto Asset Hedge Funds.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: LedgerPrime
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: LedgerPrime is a quantitative and systematic digital asset investment firm.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Digital Asset Capital Management (DACM)
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: Specialist, global investment manager in the digital asset sector.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: HashKey Capital
- **Type**: Ventures Capital
- **Description**: HashKey Capital is a blockchain and cryptocurrency-focused venture capital and investment firm.
- **Lead Investor**: No
- **Name**: Balaji Srinivasan
- **Type**: Angel Investor
- **Description**: Balaji S. Srinivasan is the CTO of Coinbase and cofounder of Counsyl, Earn, Teleport, and Coin Center.

## Exchanges
- Binance: AVAX/USDT
- Coinbase: AVAX/USD
- OKX: AVAX/USDT
- Bybit: AVAX/USDT
- Kraken: AVAX/EUR
- WhiteBIT: Not available
- HTX: Not available
- P2B: Not available
- KuCoin: Not available
- Bitunix: Not available

## Token Distribution
- Foundation: 9.26%
- Airdrop: 2.5%
- Team: 10%
- Public Sale Option A1: 1%
- Public Sale Option A2: 8.3%
- Public Sale Option B: 0.67%
- Community and Development Endowment: 7%
- Testnet Incentive Program: 0.31%
- Strategic Partners: 5%
- Staking Rewards: 50%
- Private Sale: 3.46%
- Seed Sale: 2.5%

## Token Release Schedule
- Sep 2020: 40,466,016 tokens (Seed Round, Private Sale, Public Sales, etc.)
- Dec 2020: 45,188,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Mar 2021: 45,188,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Jun 2021: 45,188,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Sep 2021: 19,502,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Dec 2021: 19,502,596.8 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, etc.)
- Mar 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Jun 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Sep 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Dec 2022: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Mar 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Jun 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Sep 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Dec 2023: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Mar 2024: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Jun 2024: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Sep 2024: 9,541,800 tokens (Team, Airdrop, Foundation, Strategic Partners)
- Dec 2024: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2025: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2026: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2027: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2028: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Jun 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Sep 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Dec 2029: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)
- Mar 2030: 1,666,800 tokens (Foundation)

특허

이 프로젝트는 MIT 라이선스에 따라 라이선스가 부여됩니다. 자세한 내용은 라이선스 파일을 참조하세요.

Available Tools

1 tool
get_project_dataC
Fetch cryptocurrency project data from Mobula API.

Args:
    token_symbol (str): The symbol of the cryptocurrency token (e.g., 'BTC', 'ETH')

Returns:
    dict: Raw JSON response from Mobula API containing project details
ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
token_symbolYes

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the API source and return format, but lacks details on error handling, rate limits, authentication needs, or whether it's read-only/destructive. This leaves significant gaps for a tool interacting with an external API.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized with three sentences: purpose, parameter explanation, and return value. It's front-loaded with the main action and avoids unnecessary details, though the structure could be slightly more polished.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and low schema coverage, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the response structure beyond 'raw JSON', error cases, or API limitations, which is inadequate for a tool fetching external data.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning by explaining the parameter's purpose (cryptocurrency token symbol) and providing examples ('BTC', 'ETH'), which helps beyond the bare schema. However, it doesn't cover constraints like valid symbols or format details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Fetch') and resource ('cryptocurrency project data from Mobula API'), making the purpose understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from siblings since none exist, so it can't achieve the highest score for sibling distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or context for its application. It only states what it does without usage instructions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev1.0.0
    • First observedget_project_data
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

B3/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (get_project_data), and with no other tools to compare, consistency is inherently perfect.

Tool Count2/5

One tool is too few for a server named 'crypto-projects-mcp', which suggests a broader scope. This minimal set severely limits functionality, as it only supports fetching data without any create, update, delete, or search operations.

Completeness1/5

The tool surface is severely incomplete for the implied domain of cryptocurrency projects. It lacks essential operations like listing projects, searching, updating, or deleting data, making it inadequate for typical agent workflows in this domain.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers