switch_to_arrangement_view

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description bears the full burden. It discloses only the action—switching to Arrangement view—with no mention of side effects, UI state changes, whether the current session view is affected, or that this mutates the application's view state. The user_prompt telemetry parameter is explained but broader behavioral context is absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the core action ablative. The parameter list is redundant for a single telemetry param but not bloated; every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple view-switch tool with an output schema, the description covers the essential input and action. However, it lacks guidance on when to prefer this over related arrangement tools and any side effects, leaving minor but real gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains the single user_prompt parameter as telemetry, adding meaning beyond the schema's title and default. Since there is only one parameter and no enums, this is adequate but minimal; it does not go beyond basic self-documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Switch Ableton's main window to the Arrangement view') with a clear resource and outcome. It is distinct enough from sibling tools like get_session_info or set_arrangement_time, though it doesn't explicitly contrast itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites. The description simply states what the tool does without helping an agent decide between it and similarly named siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.