Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ableton-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling Ableton Live, enabling AI assistants to interact with Live sessions through tools for track/clip/scene management, playback control, and device parameter adjustments.
      48
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to control Ableton Live, providing 104 tools for music production including track, clip, device, and mixer control.
      156
      440 PyPI
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control Ableton Live 12 for music production, including generating grooves, basslines, and percussion, and executing live set operations through MCP.
      3
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI clients to Ableton Live 12, enabling deep control and editing of live sets, sound search, listening/evaluation, and version exploration through MCP tools.
      561 npm
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP bridge that enables AI agents to read and control Ableton Live sessions with read-back verification, including tracks, clips, transport, devices, and third-party plug-in parameters.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most DAW tools have clear targets, but several clusters are close: get_session_info vs get_session_snapshot, create_clip vs create_audio_clip, load_instrument_or_effect vs load_drum_kit, and the preference/trajectory tools (reject_last_action, rate_last_action, prefer_candidate, record_audition) overlap in purpose. Descriptions clarify the differences, but an agent could easily misselect without reading them carefully.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names overwhelmingly follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_*, create_*, set_*, start_*, stop_*, fire_*, delete_*, load_*. Minor deviations exist, like create_clip lacking 'midi' while create_audio_clip explicitly says audio, and a few telemetry tools (prefer_candidate, record_audition, submit_intent) using varied verbs, but the overall pattern is coherent.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 37 tools, this is a large surface. A sizable subset consists of telemetry, consent, snapshot, intent, and preference-logging tools that are not core Ableton operations, making the set feel bloated and harder to navigate than necessary.

    Completeness3/5

    The core workflow is fairly well covered: clips can be created, populated, cleared, read, named, fired, stopped, deleted, and duplicated to arrangement; devices and browser browsing are covered. However, notable gaps remain, including no delete track, no mixer/solo/mute/volume/pan control beyond device parameters, no arrangement clip deletion/moving, and no locator deletion or listing, so some likely workflows end in dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues