Google Cloud MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Cloud MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects to Google Cloud services, allowing users to query logs, interact with Spanner databases, and analyze monitoring metrics through natural language.78 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Google Cloud Platform environments through natural language, allowing users to query and manage GCP resources during conversations.91,740 npm200MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for Google Cloud Platform, enabling interaction with Resource Manager, Compute Engine, Cloud Storage, BigQuery, Pub/Sub, and Cloud Logging via natural language.3-
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables querying and interacting with Google Cloud services including Logging, Spanner, Monitoring, and Cloud Trace through natural language.1778 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to understand BigQuery dataset structures and execute SQL queries.5 npm5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides access to BigQuery. This server enables LLMs to inspect database schemas and execute queries.130MIT
TDQS
Scored across 40 tools
Tools are separated by service prefix, but within services like logging and Spanner, multiple tools for querying logs or databases overlap in purpose. Additionally, many tools lack descriptions, increasing ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'gcp-{service}-{action}-{noun}' in snake_case. For example, gcp-billing-list-accounts, gcp-iam-get-project-policy. No mixing of styles.
40 tools is high but not extreme for a multi-service server. However, several services have only 3 tools with missing descriptions, suggesting the count is inflated without full coverage.
Many services have significant gaps: error reporting, monitoring, profiler, and trace lack CRUD operations and detailed descriptions. Spanner is missing update/delete. Billing and logging are more complete, but overall surface is incomplete.