Slack MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Slack MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects to Slack via Socket Mode (WebSocket) and surfaces real-time message notifications through MCP tools. No public URL or ngrok needed.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Slack workspace integration. This server allows AI assistants to interact directly with your Slack workspace, providing tools to manage channels, send messages, list users, and upload files.30,839 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents access to your Slack workspaces using session tokens.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for posting messages to Slack channels via webhooks or bot API. Supports configurable usernames, emojis, and both webhook and bot token authentication modes.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that reads Slack through your own browser session, authenticating as you rather than a bot. Provides tools to search messages, retrieve channel/DM/thread history, resolve users, and post messages (write disabled by default).10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for the Slack API that enables searching, listing channels, reading history, inspecting users, fetching threads, and sending messages through controlled Slack tools.30,839 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: channels_list retrieves a list of channels, while conversations_history fetches messages from a specific channel. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the task.
Both tools follow a consistent snake_case naming convention, but the patterns differ slightly: channels_list uses a noun_verb format, while conversations_history uses a noun_noun format. This minor deviation prevents a perfect score, but the naming is still readable and mostly consistent.
With only 2 tools, this server feels too thin for a Slack integration, as it lacks essential operations like sending messages, managing users, or updating channel settings. The scope is severely limited, making it difficult for agents to perform comprehensive Slack-related tasks.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a Slack domain. While it covers listing channels and retrieving message history, it misses critical operations such as posting messages, creating channels, or handling reactions, which are core to Slack workflows and will likely cause agent failures.