Skip to main content
Glama
konkomaji

Google Marketing MCP

by konkomaji

ga4_list_accounts

List all Google Analytics 4 accounts accessible by your service account to verify your access and confirm the account was added under Admin > Account Access Management.

Instructions

List every GA4 account this credential can reach.

Call this first. If it returns nothing, the service account has not been added under Admin > Account Access Management on any account.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden, and it does so well: it states that the result is limited to accounts the credential can reach, and explains the empty-result failure mode. It doesn't cover rate limits or pagination, but those are minor for a simple list operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler: the core action is front-loaded, and the second sentence adds essential workflow context. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter discovery tool with an output schema, the description gives everything an agent needs: what it returns, when to call it, and how to interpret an empty result. The troubleshooting note adds real value without over-explaining.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics to document. The description appropriately focuses on the outcome and usage rather than inventing unneeded parameter details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The verb 'List' plus the resource 'every GA4 account this credential can reach' precisely defines both the operation and its scope. The GA4 prefix clearly separates it from ads_list_accounts and gtm_list_accounts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The instruction 'Call this first' gives explicit placement in the agent's workflow, and the follow-up diagnosis of an empty result tells the agent exactly what it means and what to check next. This is clear, actionable usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools