Skip to main content
Glama
kongyo2

EVE Online EST MCP Server

by kongyo2
OverviewSchemaRelated ServersScoreDiscussions
TypeScript
Remote

Server Quality Checklist

67%
Profile completionA complete profile improves this server's visibility in search results.

  • Latest release: v1.0.0

  • Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare against. The name 'getCurrentESTTime' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is too few for a server with the apparent scope of providing EVE Online EST time and downtime information. This feels thin and limited, lacking related operations like historical downtime checks or timezone conversions.

    Completeness2/5

    The server is severely incomplete for its domain. It only provides current time and next downtime, missing obvious gaps such as checking past downtimes, scheduling reminders, or handling timezone adjustments beyond EST/UTC.

  • Average 4.4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

    See the Tool Scores section below for per-tool breakdowns.

    • No community issues in the last 6 months
    • 0 commits in the last 12 weeks
    • No stable releases found
    • No critical vulnerability alerts
    • No high-severity vulnerability alerts
    • No code scanning findings
    • CI status not available

  • This repository is licensed under MIT License.

  • This repository includes a README.md file.

  • No tool usage detected in the last 30 days. Usage tracking helps demonstrate server value.

    Tip: use the "Try in Browser" feature on the server page to seed initial usage.

  • Add a glama.json file to provide metadata about your server.

  • If you are the author, simply .

    If the server belongs to an organization, first add glama.json to the root of your repository:

    {
  "$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/server.json",
  "maintainers": [
    "your-github-username"
  ]
}

    Then . Browse examples.

  • Add related servers to improve discoverability.

How to sync the server with GitHub?

Servers are automatically synced at least once per day, but you can also sync manually at any time to instantly update the server profile.

To manually sync the server, click the "Sync Server" button in the MCP server admin interface.

How is the quality score calculated?

The overall quality score combines two components: Tool Definition Quality (70%) and Server Coherence (30%).

Tool Definition Quality measures how well each tool describes itself to AI agents. Every tool is scored 1–5 across six dimensions: Purpose Clarity (25%), Usage Guidelines (20%), Behavioral Transparency (20%), Parameter Semantics (15%), Conciseness & Structure (10%), and Contextual Completeness (10%). The server-level definition quality score is calculated as 60% mean TDQS + 40% minimum TDQS, so a single poorly described tool pulls the score down.

Server Coherence evaluates how well the tools work together as a set, scoring four dimensions equally: Disambiguation (can agents tell tools apart?), Naming Consistency, Tool Count Appropriateness, and Completeness (are there gaps in the tool surface?).

Tiers are derived from the overall score: A (≥3.5), B (≥3.0), C (≥2.0), D (≥1.0), F (<1.0). B and above is considered passing.

Tool Scores

  • Behavior4/5

    Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

    The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond what annotations provide. While annotations indicate read-only and open-world operations, the description reveals specific implementation details: the tool uses system time with WorldTimeAPI as fallback, and it calculates time until the next scheduled downtime. This provides practical information about reliability and functionality that annotations don't cover.

    Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

    Conciseness5/5

    Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

    The description is perfectly concise and well-structured. It uses just two sentences that each earn their place: the first states the primary function, the second provides important operational context about daily maintenance and implementation details. There's zero wasted language or redundancy.

    Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

    Completeness4/5

    Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

    For a parameterless tool with good annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint) but no output schema, the description provides excellent context about what the tool returns (current time and downtime calculation) and how it works (system time with API fallback). The only minor gap is not explicitly describing the output format, but given the tool's simplicity and clear purpose, this is acceptable.

    Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

    Parameters4/5

    Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

    With 0 parameters and 100% schema description coverage, the baseline would be 4. The description appropriately doesn't discuss parameters since none exist, and instead focuses on what the tool does with no inputs. This is efficient and correct for a parameterless tool.

    Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

    Purpose5/5

    Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

    The description clearly states the tool's purpose with specific verbs ('Get current EVE Server Time' and 'calculate time until next server downtime') and identifies the resource (EVE Online servers). It distinguishes this as a time-checking tool with maintenance scheduling functionality, which is unambiguous even without sibling tools.

    Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

    Usage Guidelines4/5

    Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

    The description provides clear context about when to use this tool - for checking EVE Online server time and calculating downtime. It mentions the specific daily maintenance window (11:00-11:15 EST/UTC), giving users clear situational guidance. However, with no sibling tools, there's no need for alternative tool guidance, so it can't achieve a perfect 5.

    Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

GitHub Badge

Glama performs regular codebase and documentation scans to:

  • Confirm that the MCP server is working as expected.
  • Confirm that there are no obvious security issues.
  • Evaluate tool definition quality.

Our badge communicates server capabilities, safety, and installation instructions.

Card Badge

EVE-EST-MCP MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Score Badge

EVE-EST-MCP MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kongyo2/EVE-EST-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server