Skip to main content
Glama
procurement-awards-mcp

procurement-awards-mcp

by koizumikento

Related Servers

Alternatives to procurement-awards-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching the Japanese government's 調達ポータル for tender and award notices, reading any notice in full, and listing successful-bid records from the portal's open data.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching and browsing Japanese government tender notices from national ministries, all 47 prefectures, and municipalities via the Kankōju portal, with filters by prefecture, organization, category, date, and full notice details.
      132 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for searching Japanese government procurement bid notices (官公需) from the SME Agency's KKJ portal. Includes AI ranking, PDF requirement extraction, and CSV/calendar export.
      49 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying the Japanese corporate registry from METI's gBizINFO for company profiles, government procurement, subsidies, patents, certifications, financials, and workplace disclosures using corporate numbers or names.
      123 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching Japanese public procurement notices through the Government Procurement Information Portal, with filtering by keyword, project, organization, prefecture, category, procedure type, qualification, and dates, while returning original links and notice excerpts.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools have distinct purposes: search_awards targets individual award titles in one snapshot/delta, while summarize_awards aggregates and compares multiple fiscal years by ministry. Descriptions make the boundary clear, though both operate on award data and could occasionally be confused when an agent needs both lookup and aggregation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: search_awards and summarize_awards. The naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only two tools exist for a procurement awards domain, which feels thin. The tools are well-scoped individually, but the surface is borderline for supporting realistic award exploration and reporting workflows.

    Completeness2/5

    Coverage is limited to title search and ministry-level annual summaries. There are significant gaps such as retrieving award details, filtering by vendor/category/value, or listing awards across broader date ranges, which will constrain agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data