Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
GIA MCP Server

GIA MCP Server

by knowledgepa3
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

distill_memory_pack

Distill governance patterns from usage history to create a draft heuristic pack. Requires gate approval before production use.

Instructions

Distill governance patterns from usage history into a draft heuristic pack. Returns EPHEMERAL draft that requires MANDATORY gate to approve for production use.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "domain": "<domain>"
    },
    "name": "distill_memory_pack"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYesDomain to distill patterns from
min_usage_countNoMinimum usage events required

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.3.6

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond annotations by noting the draft is ephemeral and requires a mandatory gate, but lacks details on side effects or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded, with no unnecessary words; every sentence adds distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description omits the return structure of the draft pack and does not explain what 'usage history' refers to, leaving some gaps for a tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage, so the description does not need to add parameter details. However, it adds no extra semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool distills governance patterns from usage history into a draft heuristic pack, using a specific verb and resource, and differentiates from siblings like approve_gate and promote_memory_pack.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates the output is ephemeral and requires a mandatory gate for production, providing context on when to use, but does not explicitly exclude scenarios or name alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools