search_anime_by_season

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry full behavioral transparency. It only describes the basic function and gives examples, but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as how results are sorted (default or otherwise), pagination behavior, error handling, or rate limits. The schema covers parameter details, but the description lacks additional behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with a practical example. It is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words. Every part serves the purpose of communicating the tool's function efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (search by season) and the schema covers parameters well. However, without an output schema or description of return values, and given the lack of usage guidelines, the description feels somewhat incomplete. It adequately conveys the core purpose but leaves gaps in expected behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds examples of parameter values (e.g., '2024 spring') but does not provide deeper meaning beyond what the schema's descriptions and enum values already offer. The added value is minimal.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Search anime by season' with concrete examples ('2024 spring, 2016年秋'), which distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'search_anime' that likely searches by title or other criteria. The verb and resource are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for seasonal searches but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus sibling tools like 'search_anime' or when not to use it. No exclusions or alternative recommendations are provided, leaving the agent to infer context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.