get_organizations_by_ids

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description only says 'Get organizations', implying a read operation but not explicitly stating safety, side effects, or requirements. For a tool with missing annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits beyond a minimal verb.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple lookup tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal. While adequate, it lacks any information about the response structure (e.g., returns full organization objects). Could be improved with a brief note on what the response contains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (only param 'ids'), and the schema already includes a detailed description with example. The tool description does not add meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as no added semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Get organizations by Annict organization IDs', specifying the verb ('Get'), resource ('organizations'), and unique identifier type ('Annict organization IDs'). This clearly differentiates from sibling tools like 'search_organizations' and other 'get_*_by_ids' tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., search_organizations). Usage is implied: use when you have specific Annict organization IDs. No when-not or alternative suggestions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.