option_risk_indicator_sse

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint false, so the description need not repeat safety. It adds the data start date (20150209) and source URL, providing some context beyond annotations, but does not disclose behavior on invalid dates, data scope, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with a clear title, source URL, and structured docstring entries for parameter and return. Each line serves a purpose, though it reads more like raw documentation than a crafted tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool returning a DataFrame, the description provides basic structure (date input, DataFrame return) but lacks details about the specific risk indicators included or the output columns. Given the abundance of similar option tools, more specificity would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage for the single 'date' parameter. The description explains that 'date' is a date and that data begins at 20150209, which adds meaning beyond the schema, but it does not specify the exact format or accepted range, leaving room for ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource as SSE stock option risk indicators, with a source URL and return type. It distinguishes this tool from siblings like option_sse_greeks_sina or option_risk_analysis_em by specifying the official SSE endpoint, though it lacks an explicit verb such as 'fetch' or 'retrieve'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives. It does not state conditions, exclusions, or relationships to sibling tools, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.