bond_cash_summary_sse

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safe read-only nature is covered. The description adds the source URL and return type but does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as data freshness, pagination, or any limitations beyond what the annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is succinct, with one line of source context and a short docstring for parameters and return. It is not overly verbose, though the placement of the URL in the first line slightly affects readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides the essential source and return type. However, it lacks details on the exact contents of the returned DataFrame, expected date format, and any edge cases, making it minimally acceptable but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It provides the parameter 'date' with type str and a brief Chinese description '指定日期' (specified date), which adds some meaning. However, it does not specify the expected date format (e.g., YYYYMMDD), though the default value '20210111' hints at it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as providing bond cash market overview data from SSE, with the return type '债券成交概览' (bond transaction overview). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by specifying the SSE source and the specific overview data, though it lacks an explicit verb like 'get' or 'fetch'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only gives a source URL and parameter documentation, without mentioning exclusions, prerequisites, or scenarios where other bond tools would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.