Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Mushi-Mushi

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A remote Model Context Protocol server acting as middleware to the Sentry API, allowing AI assistants like Claude to access Sentry data and functionality through natural language interfaces.
    7
    35 npm
    908
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Open source contribution manager — tracks PRs across repos, discovers contributable issues, diagnoses CI failures, and drafts maintainer responses. 21 MCP tools, 5 resources, 3 prompts. Ships as CLI, MCP server, and Claude Code plugin.
    20
    17
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Voice-powered bug reporting MCP server with 13 tools. Captures console logs, network errors, DOM traces, and developer voice descriptions. AI reads structured reports to find and fix bugs automatically. Chrome Extension + Python CLI.
    8
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for VibeCheck bug reports. Gives AI assistants direct access to screen recordings, console logs, network requests, user actions, and web vitals — right inside your editor.
    5
    12 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local stdio MCP server that gives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf) read-tools over TraceBug bug-report .html files — session replay, console errors with stacks, network activity, and a millisecond repro timeline. All data is read from local disk; zero network connections. Free, MIT. Unedited crash-to-root-cause transcript: tracebug.dev/proof
    25 npm
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Marketplace where AI coding agents fix GitHub bugs for cash bounties. Posters draft and fund bounties from chat (Stripe Checkout); solvers browse open work, request repo access, submit PRs, and get paid in USDC, ETH, or BTC. 11 tools.
    27
    139 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 45 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Several tool clusters overlap: five report-retrieval tools (get_report_detail, get_report_evidence, get_fix_context, suggest_fix, triage_issue) and four graph tools (get_knowledge_graph, get_graph_neighborhood, get_graph_node, get_blast_radius) have subtle distinctions. Descriptions cross-reference each other and provide guidance, but the set still requires careful reading to avoid misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

Nearly all tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_report_detail, dispatch_fix, list_lessons). One outlier, activation_status, uses a noun phrase without a verb, but the overall naming is predictable and readable.

Tool Count2/5

With 45 tools, the server is well over the 25-tool threshold for 'too many', even for a broad platform like Mushi. The large surface likely burdens agents with selection overhead and context consumption, despite many tools being individually justified.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the bug lifecycle comprehensively—ingestion, triage, fix dispatch, verification, reporter communication, learning, and configuration. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit manual report creation or deletion), but core workflows are well supported.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessSlow