Skip to main content
Glama
kenlim-mops

GTM Data MCP

by kenlim-mops

Related Servers

Alternatives to GTM Data MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables composable search and filtering over an enterprise data catalog, with tools for lineage, sample data, profiling, history, quality rules, and AI-driven classification.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes marketing catalogs (offers, assets, campaigns, and computed metrics) to MCP clients, enabling natural language queries and AI-driven marketing analysis.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language setup and management of a governed digital product catalog, including schema, products, and rules, with dry-run previews, audit logging, and two-phase confirmations for destructive actions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to autonomously manage and improve execution processes for repetitive task types by storing reusable task contexts with associated artifacts (practices, rules, prompts, learnings) and providing full-text search across historical best practices.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides standardized brand guidelines and structured content templates for marketing assets like blogs, emails, and social media. It serves as a central source of truth for brand voice and strategy through an extensible file-based system.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several read-oriented tools overlap in scope: resolve_ownership and get_personnel_map both return responsibility relationships, and get_measurement_inventory, get_account_context, and get_record all offer relationship-rich snapshots. The descriptions generally clarify the primary focus of each tool, but an agent could still struggle to pick between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names are overwhelmingly snake_case with a consistent gtm_ prefix and verb-first structure, e.g., get_, list_, search_, generate_, validate_. The only notable deviation is gtm_module_status, which uses a noun phrase rather than a verb_noun pattern, though it remains readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Fifteen tools is within a reasonable range for a broad data governance domain, and most tools serve a distinct read or validation purpose. However, the count feels slightly high because some tools could be consolidated or aligned more tightly around core entities.

    Completeness3/5

    The server is strong on read, search, lineage, readiness, and bulk-change validation coverage, so most query-oriented workflows are supported. However, there are no lifecycle or mutation tools: source updates can be listed but not approved/applied, records cannot be created or updated, and bulk changes can be generated and validated but not submitted. This leaves notable workflow dead ends, even if the read-only boundary is intentional.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues