kenda_waste_by_agent
Retrieves per-agent spend and identifies wasted dollars.
Instructions
Per-agent spend and redundant (wasted) dollars.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieves per-agent spend and identifies wasted dollars.
Per-agent spend and redundant (wasted) dollars.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description implies a read operation but fails to mention data freshness, aggregation details, or lack of side effects. Minimal behavioral context beyond the obvious.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks output schema, but description sufficiently conveys what the tool returns. Could detail the structure (e.g., currency, time period) but adequate for a simple tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Description does not need to add parameter info; it appropriately describes the output.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns per-agent spend and wasted dollars, distinguishing it from the sibling tool kenda_spend_summary which likely provides aggregate spend.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs kenda_spend_summary. The description lacks when-not-to-use or alternative conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kenda-co/ingestion-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server