kenda-ingestion-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to kenda-ingestion-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to self-audit their token usage and costs, providing burn reports, forensics, and optimization recommendations via MCP.65 PyPI113MIT

Keplr Wallet MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceYour AI-powered wallet for Cosmos. Send, stake, swap — just ask.5MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides cost analysis of AI agent usage by previewing scrubbed metadata before upload and analyzing spend, cache-hit rates, and waste recovery through a local or remote server.2MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the Dysnomia blockchain ecosystem on PulseChain, allowing natural language queries for contract state, transaction debugging, minter tracing, and ecosystem graph mapping.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceBrings BlockDAG blockchain data to AI assistants, enabling natural language queries for balances, transactions, tokens, and network stats.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConnects CashChat financial data to AI assistants, enabling users to manage transactions, view spending summaries, and track category breakdowns through natural language. It supports both local stdio and remote URL-based connections with secure OAuth 2.0 authentication.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one provides an org-wide summary of spend/waste/health, the other breaks down waste per agent. No overlap or ambiguity.
Both tool names use the 'kenda_' prefix and are descriptive (spend_summary, waste_by_agent). While not a strict verb_noun pattern, the naming is consistent in style and clearly conveys the tool's function.
With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for a focused domain of Kenda spend/waste. The count is slightly low but reasonable for a targeted set.
The server covers top-level summary and per-agent waste, but lacks other potentially useful operations like time trends, department breakdowns, or cost allocation. Notable gaps exist for a more complete spend analysis surface.