remove_external_debt_tool

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a destructive operation but does not disclose side effects, irreversibility, or any required permissions. With no annotations, the description carries the burden and only partially addresses it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with no redundant words. The action and resource are front-loaded, and the extra 'Plaid-only' note is brief but potentially useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple deletion tool, the description is minimally sufficient, but it omits any mention of return values, success/failure behavior, or edge cases. It is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'debt_id' has no schema description and the tool description does not explain its format, origin, or how to obtain it. Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not compensate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('an external debt entry'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like add, update, list, and summarize debt. The purpose is immediately obvious.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as update_external_debt_tool or clear_account_override_tool. The 'Plaid-only' note is a constraint but not a usage condition.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.