get_active_workspace
Returns the ID and name of the active workspace on the currently focused monitor.
Instructions
Get the currently active workspace on the focused monitor.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Returns the ID and name of the active workspace on the currently focused monitor.
Get the currently active workspace on the focused monitor.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It discloses no side effects or failure modes, but as a simple read operation with no parameters, the basic behavior is clear.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, appropriately concise. Could be slightly more structured (e.g., mention return value) but overall tight.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing details about return value format (workspace number/name?) and edge cases; incomplete for a tool with no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters in schema; baseline 4 applies as there are no parameter details needed beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the specific resource 'currently active workspace on the focused monitor'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_workspaces' by specifying scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no when-not-to-use or context provided; purely functional statement.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/keanehatescoding/hyprland-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server