get_update_notices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral burden. Saying it 'retrieves' a list signals a read-only operation, but the description provides no details about pagination, response ordering, or operational constraints, relying on the output schema to fill those gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that immediately states the action and resource with no filler. For a zero-parameter list tool, this is an appropriately sized and front-loaded description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, parameterless list operation with an output schema, the description is largely complete. It only lacks explicit comparison to sibling notice tools, which is already reflected in the usage guidelines score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so there is nothing to explain. This meets the zero-parameter baseline, and the description correctly implies that no inputs are required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('조회합니다') and states the resource ('업데이트 공지 목록'). The 'update' qualifier differentiates it from similar notice tools among the siblings, though it does not explicitly define how update notices differ from general, event, or cash shop notices.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided for when to use get_update_notices versus get_notices, get_event_notices, get_cashshop_notices, or get_notice_detail. The correct choice must be inferred from the tool name rather than from any explicit condition or alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.