Skip to main content
Glama
kctw-dev

Talk to Figma MCP

by kctw-dev

Related Servers

Alternatives to Talk to Figma MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, modify, and manage Figma designs through natural language commands via a specialized MCP server and plugin bridge. It supports a wide range of operations including element creation, property modification, component management, and accessibility checks.
      13 npm
      105
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access Figma design context, generate code from frames, extract variables, components, and layout data, and create or modify Figma files directly from MCP clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and write Figma designs through a local WebSocket relay, turning Figma selections into framework-aware code and building/editing designs directly on the canvas. Provides 112 MCP tools for bidirectional design-code workflows with support for any MCP client.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Figma to create, read, and manage designs using the Figma REST API and a dedicated plugin. It supports advanced features like UI generation from text, webpage reconstruction in Figma, and design token synchronization with codebases.
      20
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open-source, bidirectional Figma agent for MCP clients — a free alternative to Figma's Dev Mode MCP. Reads designs with high-fidelity grounding and writes back to the canvas: frames, text, auto-layout, styles, variables, and components. 92 tools, no API token, no paid Figma seat.
      100
      738
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 65 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping purposes, such as 'read_my_design' and 'get_selection' which both provide detailed selection info, and 'scan_text_nodes' vs 'walk_and_scan_text' which both scan text nodes. While many tools are distinct, these ambiguities could cause an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., 'create_rectangle', 'set_fill_color'). The main outlier is 'read_my_design', which breaks the pattern with 'my' and differs from others like 'get_selection'. Overall, naming is largely predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    Sixty-five tools is excessive for a typical MCP server, exceeding the 'too many' threshold of 25+. While Figma has a broad feature set, the tool count feels bloated and could be streamlined, e.g., by merging similar tools or reducing granularity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of Figma operations: node CRUD, styling, text, components, instances, libraries, variables, prototyping, and annotations. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit boolean operations), but the surface is comprehensive for most design workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessResponsive