Skip to main content
Glama
kayomarz97

TransBench

by kayomarz97
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to TransBench

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • labmate-mcp

      JonasRackl
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An AI lab companion that connects Claude to scientific databases, computational chemistry tools, bench references, and publication utilities, covering the entire research workflow from literature search to publication.
      2
      MIT

    • research-mentor-rag

      GelortZCY
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates a 1200-paper RAG database with six tools to support research workflows across stages like hypothesis, experiment, statistics, and writing. It routes requests to specialized skills and real-time frontier searches to provide evidence-grounded research mentoring.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • SciAgentKit

      ehsansyh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP-native scientific skills for reproducible computational biology and AI-driven drug-discovery workflows. It combines deterministic scientific tools with an MCP server to give AI agents real computational capabilities.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose: generate_experiment starts a job for a research brief, search_grounded_evidence starts a job for evidence retrieval, and get_experiment_result polls for results. Descriptions are detailed and clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (generate_experiment, get_experiment_result, search_grounded_evidence). There is no mixing of conventions or ambiguous verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 3 tools, the set is small but well-scoped for an async job submission and polling pattern. It covers the essential operations without being overly minimal, though a tool to list or cancel jobs might be missing.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the core workflow: submitting two types of jobs and retrieving results. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose, but additional features like job cancellation or listing completed jobs would enhance completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources