Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
cam-product-viability-standard

cam-product-viability-standard

by kau17033
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to cam-product-viability-standard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Wealth Engine

      neoki
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access ranked economic opportunities and AI-voice pricing intelligence, including falsifiable experiment design, monetization paths, success/kill criteria, and margin calculations grounded in public evidence.
      -

    • Agentic Commerce RFQ Multi

      Alpha-Park
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous evaluation and ranking of wholesale vendor bids for B2B RFQs by weighing unit volume pricing, minimum order quantities, landed tariffs, net payment terms, and historical lead-time reliability to select the best supplier.
      7
      -

    • okaneland-mcp

      TheBaronofAI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides current, human-verified pricing for 100+ AI tools and calculates AI product margins (MRR after costs). Fetches live price index and runs locally.
      2
      40 npm
      MIT

    • abandoncheck

      CloudCorpRecords
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables clients to judge whether a dependency is maintained from caller-supplied factual signals such as archival status, release and commit recency, recent commit count, maintainer count, and open issues. It returns a verdict, score, signal bands, and the exact reasons behind the result without fetching data or inspecting code.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of selection confusion. Its purpose — compute a CAM verdict from six cost inputs — is unambiguous and well-bounded.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single name cam_verdict is clear snake_case and matches the server's cam- prefix. With only one tool there is no pattern to verify across the set, which prevents a full 5.

    Tool Count3/5

    A one-tool server is on the thin side by the rubric's 3-15 guidance, but this tool is non-trivial and fully earns its place for a narrowly scoped verdict standard. It is borderline rather than mismatched.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers its stated lifecycle end to end: it takes all six cost items, enforces the return reserve, and returns one of three fixed verdicts with an incomplete-handling path. Minor gaps exist (no batch evaluation of multiple products, no way to inspect the standard or thresholds), but these are workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources