Skip to main content
Glama
kapilduraphe

Okta MCP Server

deactivate_user

Deactivate a user in Okta by providing their unique identifier, enabling efficient user management through the Okta MCP Server.

Instructions

Deactivate a user in Okta

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userIdYesThe unique identifier of the Okta user

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler function for the 'deactivate_user' tool. It validates the input using the Zod schema, retrieves the Okta client, and calls deactivateUser API to deactivate the specified user ID.
    deactivate_user: async (request: { parameters: unknown }) => {
      const { userId } = userSchemas.deactivateUser.parse(request.parameters);
    
      try {
        const oktaClient = getOktaClient();
    
        await oktaClient.userApi.deactivateUser({
          userId,
        });
    
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: "text",
              text: `User with ID ${userId} has been deactivated.`,
            },
          ],
        };
      } catch (error) {
        console.error("Error deactivating user:", error);
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: "text",
              text: `Failed to deactivate user: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
            },
          ],
          isError: true,
        };
      }
  • Tool registration entry in the userTools array that defines the name, description, and input schema for the 'deactivate_user' tool.
    {
      name: "deactivate_user",
      description: "Deactivate a user in Okta",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          userId: {
            type: "string",
            description: "The unique identifier of the Okta user",
          },
        },
        required: ["userId"],
      },
  • Zod input validation schema for the deactivate_user tool, ensuring userId is a non-empty string.
    deactivateUser: z.object({
      userId: z.string().min(1, "User ID is required"),
    }),
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While 'Deactivate' implies a mutation, it lacks details on permissions required, reversibility, side effects (e.g., data retention), or response format. This is a significant gap for a potentially destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence with no wasted words, making it highly concise and front-loaded. It efficiently communicates the core purpose without unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It fails to address critical aspects like behavioral traits, error handling, or return values, leaving gaps that could hinder effective tool use by an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'userId' clearly documented in the schema. The description does not add any meaning beyond this, such as format examples or validation rules, so it meets the baseline for adequate but unenhanced parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Deactivate') and resource ('a user in Okta'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it does not differentiate this tool from its sibling 'suspend_user', which likely serves a similar but distinct function, preventing a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'suspend_user' or 'delete_user', nor does it mention prerequisites or context for deactivation. Without such information, users must infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kapilduraphe/okta-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server