kanibal-tools-mcp
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| check_telemarketing_consentA | France only: is a consent to telephone canvassing still valid under décret 2026-662? |
| rank_lead_sources_by_kept_meetingA | Rank B2B lead sources on cost per kept qualified meeting instead of cost per lead. |
| gdpr_offshore_gap_reportA | GDPR gap report for customer-service processing outsourced outside the EU/EEA. |
| select_least_cost_capable_modelA | Pick, from a supplied catalogue, the model with the lowest declared cost rank among those that have every required capability and are available and authorised. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools target clearly different tasks: lead-source cost ranking, French telemarketing consent validity, GDPR offshore outsourcing gap reporting, and model selection. Their names and descriptions make misselection unlikely. Compliance-related tools exist, but one is narrowly about French consent and the other about GDPR outsourcing, so the boundary is clear.
All names use snake_case and are descriptive, but the naming pattern is not consistent: three tools start with verbs while gdpr_offshore_gap_report is a noun phrase. The convention is readable but not a uniform verb_noun pattern.
Four tools is a reasonable size for a compact utility server, and each tool appears to represent a substantive standalone operation. The set is heterogeneous rather than tightly scoped, but the count itself is not excessive or thin.
Each tool appears to cover its specific self-contained calculation or check, with documented input formats and fail-closed behavior. There is no obvious CRUD lifecycle to complete, though the server lacks broader validation, explanation, or workflow tools that might be expected in a larger toolkit.