Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SWMM-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Eleven local stdio MCP servers exposing a reproducible EPA SWMM stormwater-modelling workflow: model building, simulation with run manifests and continuity checks, calibration, GIS/QGIS, design storms and climate scenarios, uncertainty analysis, plotting, and modelling memory.
      4
      26
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to retrieve structured network information, including routing, interfaces, MPLS, and topology, from devices using gNMI and OpenConfig models. It facilitates real-time network analysis, log filtering, and status monitoring through a standardized interface.
      10
      14
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Ansys CFX through PyCFX, supporting natural-language-assisted CFX-Pre, CFX Solver, and CFD-Post workflows for setup, execution, and postprocessing.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides data visualization and machine learning tools, featuring automated intent-based pipeline routing for data cleaning and model training. It enables LLMs to process CSV or JSON data to generate visual charts, perform regressions, or execute clustering analysis.
      16
      -

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific SWMM operations like model management, data retrieval, and plotting. However, some overlap exists between 'get_input_info'/'get_input_sections' and 'get_report_info'/'get_report_sections', which could cause confusion in selecting the right file section tool. Overall, descriptions help clarify, but minor ambiguity remains.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as 'list_models', 'run_model', and 'plot_output_data'. There are minor deviations like 'add_storage' (verb_noun) and 'change_conduit' (verb_noun) fitting the pattern, but 'prompt_model_upload' is slightly longer and less standard. Overall, naming is mostly predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a SWMM modeling server covering model upload, modification, running, and data analysis. It includes essential operations without being overly bloated, though it borders on heavy. The tools are well-scoped for the domain, with each serving a clear function.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for SWMM modeling workflows, including CRUD-like operations (upload, duplicate, run), data retrieval (input/output/report sections), modifications (change storm, conduit, storage), and visualization (plotting maps, rainfall, output). There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform full lifecycle tasks from model setup to analysis without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues