dataframe_correlation_matrix
Compute Pearson correlation coefficients between numeric columns in CSV data to identify linear relationships.
Instructions
返回数值列之间的皮尔逊相关系数矩阵。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| csv_text | Yes |
Compute Pearson correlation coefficients between numeric columns in CSV data to identify linear relationships.
返回数值列之间的皮尔逊相关系数矩阵。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| csv_text | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must disclose all behavioral traits. It only states the output type but omits assumptions (e.g., handling of non-numeric columns, missing data, required data format).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-formed sentence that directly conveys the tool's function without any extraneous words. It is appropriately sized for the simple operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description lacks information about input format expectations, output structure, and error handling. Given no output schema and low complexity, it still leaves gaps for correct usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage, and the tool description does not explain the single parameter 'csv_text' (format, encoding, required structure). The description adds no value beyond the schema definition.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns a Pearson correlation coefficient matrix for numerical columns, using a specific verb and resource. It is distinct from sibling tools like 'correlation' which may handle single pairs or different methods.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'correlation' or 'dataframe_describe'. No context about prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/k-ming/Scientific-computing-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server