Skip to main content
Glama
jwconsultancyteam

Limitguard

by jwconsultancyteam
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Limitguard

  • agentmail

    kindrat86
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides AI agents with compliance screening (OFAC sanctions, risk scoring, Know-Your-Agent) plus disposable email and SMS verification for OTPs, accessible via MCP tools, HTTP API, and CLI.
    10
    2
    MIT

  • eu-verify

    contentfactory
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    eu-verify lets AI agents verify any European business partner: company existence (official French SIREN registry), insolvency records (BODACC), EU VAT validation before invoicing (VIES), SIRET/IBAN/LEI checks, address and email verification, French business-day deadlines and EU public tenders. 10 paid MCP tools + a free catalog tool, plus 81 HTTP endpoints. Each call costs $0.001-$0.01 in USDC on
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • Compliance & Sanções

    mcp-dir
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables due diligence and KYC by querying PEPs, national and international sanctions, debarment lists, arrest warrants, criminal records, leniency agreements, and forced labor registries via hosted, prepaid read-only MCP tools.
    MIT
  • Qorenext Trade Screening MCP by QoreNext

    Qorenext Trade Screening MCPofficial

    QoreNext
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Real-time trade screening intelligence for Claude and other AI clients — screen entities against trade screening and restricted-party information through an MCP-compatible interface, enabling faster compliance research and reducing manual screening effort.
    MIT

  • sanctions-io

    pipeworx-io
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables screening names and batches against global sanctions, PEP, and watchlists for AML compliance, returning scored matches.
    20 npm
    MIT

  • io.github.atomno-mcp/mcp

    atomno-mcp
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables sanctions and watchlist screening of persons and entities against public lists such as Rosfinmonitoring, OFAC SDN, EU consolidated, UK OFSI, and UN Security Council from any MCP client.
    5
    80 PyPI
    MIT

  • Sanctions Screening MCP Server

    apifymcpfactory-droid
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Screens names and companies against OFAC, EU, UK, and UN sanctions lists with fuzzy-match scores, supporting bulk lookups for AML/KYC checks. Data is sourced directly from official government lists and cached for fast repeat checks.
    -

  • opensanctions-mcp

    scka-de
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for sanctions screening and PEP checks via OpenSanctions API. Search entities, match against 320+ sanctions lists, and run compound compliance investigations with AI agents.
    6
    22 npm
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation3/5

The set has several clusters of overlapping tools: check_entity vs get_risk_score vs get_compliance_report vs get_trust_score all serve entity risk, and verify_wallet vs wallet_sanctions_preview vs check_agent_wallet all screen wallets, with sanctions_preview/sanctions_screen/wallet_sanctions_preview forming a third cluster. The descriptions do a good job cross-referencing depth and pricing to differentiate them, but the semantic inversion between check_entity's trust_level (high=low risk) and get_risk_score's risk_level (high=high risk) is a genuine misselection trap.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (check_entity, get_trust_score, verify_wallet, get_compliance_report, verify_lead). Verb choice varies across synonyms (check_ vs get_ vs verify_) and the three sanctions_* tools drop the verb entirely, which is a minor deviation rather than a break in convention.

Tool Count5/5

Ten tools is well-scoped for a screening service, and each tool occupies a distinct niche defined by target (entity/wallet/agent/lead), depth (preview/full/report) and cost. Nothing feels like filler or a duplicate entry.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers entity checks, quick risk scoring, full sanctions screening, wallets, agent wallets, compliance reporting, stored-score retrieval and lead verification—broad lifecycle coverage for a risk-screening domain. Gaps like ongoing monitoring, PEP-only screens or bulk/batch checks exist but are minor workarounds.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week

Resources