Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Limitguard

Limitguard

by jwconsultancyteam
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Limitguard

  • agentmail

    kindrat86
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides AI agents with compliance screening (OFAC sanctions, risk scoring, Know-Your-Agent) plus disposable email and SMS verification for OTPs, accessible via MCP tools, HTTP API, and CLI.
    10
    2
    MIT

  • eu-verify

    contentfactory
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    eu-verify lets AI agents verify any European business partner: company existence (official French SIREN registry), insolvency records (BODACC), EU VAT validation before invoicing (VIES), SIRET/IBAN/LEI checks, address and email verification, French business-day deadlines and EU public tenders. 10 paid MCP tools + a free catalog tool, plus 81 HTTP endpoints. Each call costs $0.001-$0.01 in USDC on
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • EU Business Data MCP

    wsystemdev
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and onboarding/KYB workflows to validate VAT and EORI numbers, look up companies, screen sanctions lists, and run combined checks through remote MCP tools and a pay-per-call API.
    MIT
  • Clearparty MCP Server

    Clearparty MCP Serverofficial

    clearparty
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents to check companies before payments, invoices, or contracts by resolving legal entities in GLEIF, walking parent chains, screening against OFAC, EU, UN, and UK sanctions lists, and validating EU VAT numbers in VIES.
    MIT

  • Compliance & Sanções

    mcp-dir
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables due diligence and KYC by querying PEPs, national and international sanctions, debarment lists, arrest warrants, criminal records, leniency agreements, and forced labor registries via hosted, prepaid read-only MCP tools.
    MIT
  • Qorenext Trade Screening MCP

    Qorenext Trade Screening MCPofficial

    QoreNext
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Real-time trade screening intelligence for Claude and other AI clients — screen entities against trade screening and restricted-party information through an MCP-compatible interface, enabling faster compliance research and reducing manual screening effort.
    MIT

  • sanctions-io

    pipeworx-io
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables screening names and batches against global sanctions, PEP, and watchlists for AML compliance, returning scored matches.
    270 npm
    MIT
  • Agentum

    Agentumofficial

    Algiras
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to resolve corporate entities across global registries, validate EU VAT numbers via VIES, and screen against OFAC/EU/UN sanctions lists through streamable HTTP MCP tools and REST endpoints.
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation3/5

The set has several clusters of overlapping tools: check_entity vs get_risk_score vs get_compliance_report vs get_trust_score all serve entity risk, and verify_wallet vs wallet_sanctions_preview vs check_agent_wallet all screen wallets, with sanctions_preview/sanctions_screen/wallet_sanctions_preview forming a third cluster. The descriptions do a good job cross-referencing depth and pricing to differentiate them, but the semantic inversion between check_entity's trust_level (high=low risk) and get_risk_score's risk_level (high=high risk) is a genuine misselection trap.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (check_entity, get_trust_score, verify_wallet, get_compliance_report, verify_lead). Verb choice varies across synonyms (check_ vs get_ vs verify_) and the three sanctions_* tools drop the verb entirely, which is a minor deviation rather than a break in convention.

Tool Count5/5

Ten tools is well-scoped for a screening service, and each tool occupies a distinct niche defined by target (entity/wallet/agent/lead), depth (preview/full/report) and cost. Nothing feels like filler or a duplicate entry.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers entity checks, quick risk scoring, full sanctions screening, wallets, agent wallets, compliance reporting, stored-score retrieval and lead verification—broad lifecycle coverage for a risk-screening domain. Gaps like ongoing monitoring, PEP-only screens or bulk/batch checks exist but are minor workarounds.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessLimited data

Resources