cairn
Related Servers
Alternatives to cairn
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides local-first, project-aware durable memory for coding agents, with a human-reviewed Markdown vault, MCP daemon, and dashboard for managing and retrieving shared knowledge.39 PyPI15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal, searchable project memory for AI coding agents. Markdown source of truth, MCP interface, safe structured updates315Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local-first MCP server and CLI that gives coding agents structured project memory, task contracts, context packs, backlog workflows, and verification evidence, storing data in reviewable Markdown/YAML with a fast SQLite index.4-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives AI coding agents persistent, cross-session memory by storing task insights as interlinked markdown knowledge cards and recalling relevant ones before new work begins. Uses plain files and git sync instead of a vector database or embeddings, and exposes this through MCP tools for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code Copilot, Codex, Windsurf, and other clients.5 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA structured project memory MCP server that persists plans, builds, reviews, and decisions across AI coding sessions and tools, enabling continuous project management with a dashboard.11MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenancePersistent memory for AI agents built on the LLM Wiki pattern: a plain-Markdown brain (also a valid Obsidian vault) with SQLite metadata, local semantic search via fastembed (no API keys), one-call session context with project auto-detection, and a decision log with rationale. Works with Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, and any MCP client.31MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct roles: read_note (single full note), list_notes (filtered enumeration), search (keyword match), capture (create), update_note (mutate). The main overlap is between summary-style tools — context, recent, precedent_brief and queue_next all answer variants of 'what should I look at' — but the descriptions draw usable boundaries (project brief vs. recent activity vs. pre-goal history vs. next queue item).
There is a loose family pattern (read_note, list_notes, update_note, queue_add, queue_next, precedent_brief, precedent_log) but it is mixed with bare nouns/verbs: search, context, recent, capture, log, code_todos. The prefix grouping (note/queue/precedent) helps readability, yet the overall convention is inconsistent.
13 tools sits comfortably in the sensible range for a notes/tasks/decisions server and each maps to a real operation. A few (precedent_brief, precedent_log) are narrow, workflow-specific additions rather than core surface, so the set is slightly heavier than strictly necessary.
Creation (capture, log, queue_add), retrieval (search, read_note, list_notes, context, recent) and in-place mutation (update_note) are covered, but there is no delete, archive, or supersede-by-removal operation for notes, and journal entries appear append-only. Queue items can only be completed indirectly via precedent_log's queue_path, leaving dead ends for basic lifecycle management.