Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Strava MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server to fetch Strava activities using OAuth authentication with automatic token refresh. Allows retrieving recent activities, activities by date range, activity details, and athlete stats.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI agents with secure, read-only access to personal Strava fitness data, including activities, performance stats, and more through 21 MCP tools.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Strava v3 API as read-only tools for AI agents. It covers athlete profiles, activities, stats, routes, segments, and rate limits, with OAuth2 authorization handled via a companion HTTP server.
      20
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides MCP servers for Claude to access fitness data from Strava and intervals.icu, enabling natural language queries for activity analysis, advanced training metrics, and wellness tracking.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific Strava resources (activities, segments, routes, clubs, gear) with clear action verbs. However, some overlap exists: 'strava_get_activity_streams' and 'strava_get_segment_effort_streams' both provide time-series data, which could cause confusion about when to use each. The 'strava_list_activity_zones' and 'strava_get_athlete_zones' also cover similar zone concepts but for different contexts.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent 'strava_verb_noun' pattern throughout, using snake_case uniformly. The verbs are predictable (get, list, create, update, star, export) and align well with the resource types (activity, segment, route, club, athlete, gear). This makes the tool set easy to navigate and understand at a glance.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 33 tools, the count feels heavy for a single-domain server, potentially overwhelming for agents. While Strava's API is feature-rich, this many tools may indicate over-fragmentation (e.g., separate tools for similar stream types or list functions). A more consolidated set (e.g., 15-20 tools) could improve usability without losing functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of Strava's core domain, including full CRUD/lifecycle operations for activities (create, get, list, update), segments (explore, get, star, efforts), routes (get, export), clubs (get, list members/admins/activities), and athlete data (profile, stats, zones). It handles key workflows like file uploads, streams, and social features (comments, kudos), leaving no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues