withdraw_all

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructive hint. Description adds cost details (~90,000 energy + ~300 bandwidth) and confirms the operation redeems all jTokens. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence plus a cost note. Extremely concise and front-loaded with essential information, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and description does not specify return values or prerequisites (e.g., must have supplied assets). Adequate but could be more complete for a full withdrawal operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and schema descriptions are adequate. Description mentions jToken symbol for market but does not add meaningful extra context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (withdraw all), resource (supplied assets from JustLend market), and mechanism (redeem all jTokens). It distinguishes from siblings like 'withdraw' and 'moolah_withdraw_collateral'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides cost estimate but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'withdraw' for partial withdrawal. Implies full withdrawal but lacks direct comparisons.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.