Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to justhandled

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Near-term paid hop: JSON Schema draft/validate (transform.json_schema ≈ $0.02; unpaid tools/call → HTTP 402, x402 USDC on Base). Receipt→JSON (parse.receipt ≈ $0.10) remains demo/depth. Discover tools free via tools/list; pay per tools/call with x402 USDC on Base (default). Prepaid fiat packs closed; existing balances still debit. Fail-closed.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to call pay-per-call x402 endpoints on Base mainnet using the caller's own USDC wallet, covering single and batch token risk checks, the latest BTC radar signal, project info, and a free health probe. Payments are EIP-3009 signed with a configurable per-call spending cap, and any quote with an unexpected payee, network, or asset is refused before payment.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to look up token risk verdicts and ERC20 facts, wallet snapshots, gas prices, transaction summaries, and Basename resolution on the Base network. Each call is paid in USDC over x402 from a dedicated wallet the user controls, with per-call price caps and a session budget.
      495 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few pairs like the two Chicago change packets or the agent run evidence pack versus its component audits could cause some initial confusion. Descriptions are specific enough to resolve ambiguity after reading.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools consistently follow the 'justhandled_' prefix with lower_snake_case descriptive names. While some are noun-based and others verb-based, the pattern is predictable and uniform across the entire set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 33 tools, the server exceeds the recommended range for a well-scoped MCP server. The high count makes it feel bloated and harder to navigate, even though each tool serves a specific niche.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a wide range of validation, preflight, audit, and evidence-related tasks, showing strong coverage of its apparent domain. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no general purpose file integrity checker), but most workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues