get_wisembly_sessions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions 'fetch' which implies a read operation, but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like authentication requirements, rate limits, error handling, or what the output looks like (especially since there's no output schema). This is a significant gap for a tool with no annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded with the core purpose, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'sessions data' includes, how results are returned, or any behavioral constraints. For a tool fetching data from an API, this leaves too many unknowns for effective agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the single parameter 'keyword' as 'The keyword to search for in the Wisembly API'. The description adds 'by event id', which might imply a relationship between 'keyword' and 'event id', but this is ambiguous and doesn't clearly enhance the schema's information. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('fetch') and resource ('sessions data from the Wisembly API'), making the purpose understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from the sibling tool 'get_wisembly_event' beyond mentioning 'by event id', which is somewhat vague about how it relates to the sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides minimal guidance with 'by event id', but it doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool versus the sibling 'get_wisembly_event', nor does it mention any prerequisites or alternatives. This leaves the agent with little context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.